GOODRICH SILVERTOWN, INC., Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent. These two claims are for bills sold to the State by claimant 4 FENOGLIO ET AL. v. STATE OF ILLINOIS.
Case summary
The claimant sought payment for bills totaling $33.30 sold to the State. The court dismissed the claims because they had been paid by the Department of Conservation, satisfying the cause of action.
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed. Where it appears claim has
( Nos. 1605-1606-Claims dismissed.)
Opinion filed September 8, 1931.
GOODRICH SILVERTOWN, INC., Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.
DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed. Where it appears claim has been paid the case will be dismissed.
Per Curiam: These two claims are for bills sold to the State by claimant aggregating in value $33.30. Since the claims were filed in [*4] this court they have been paid by the Department of Conservation, and as the cause of action has been satisfied they are dismissed.