Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Carpenter et al. v. State of Illinois

7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 22 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-11-05 No. 1403
Disposition: (No. 1403-Claim dismissed.)
Cite as: Carpenter et al. v. State of Illinois, 7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 22 (1931)

RUSSELL L. CARPENTER AND JOHN CARPENTER, Claimants, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimants failed to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution, so the court dismissed the claim without an award.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Where,

upon motion of Attorney General to show cause why case should not be dis- Now comes Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General, and

Per Curiam: Now comes Oscar E. Carlstrom, Attorney General, and makes his motion for dismissal, pursuant to an order to show cause entered by this court on the 8th day of September, A. D. 1931, wherein the claimant was ordered to show cause on or before November 3rd, 1931, why this case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution.

And it appearing to the court that cause has not been shown by claimant in accordance with said order, it is hereby ordered that the claim be dismissed without an award and the case stricken from the docket.

Official volume 7 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1931–June 30, 1933)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.