Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Martin Wunderlich v. State of Illinois

7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 52 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1931-12-08 No. 1861
Disposition: (No. 1861-Claimant awarded $10,956.01.) Award: $10,956.01 Agency: Department of Public Works and Buildings
Cite as: Martin Wunderlich v. State of Illinois, 7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 52 (1931)
Legacy General 7 awarded 1930s Martin Wunderlich v. State of Illinois 7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 52 1931-12-08 (No. 1861-Claimant awarded $10,956.01.) /opinions/v07-p0070-1/

MARTIN WUNDERLICH, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant contracted with the Department of Public Works and Buildings for road construction, but the contract was invalidated by a court ruling. The department stipulated that claimant was entitled to payment for work performed in good faith, and the court awarded the stipulated amount.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-work performed under contract, cancelled before completion, because of invalidity of law under which awarded-stipulation-when award may be made. An award is made herein on authority of Bishop Construction Co. vs. State, No. 1845, ante.

On September 21, 1931, the Department of Public Works and Buildings awarded a contract to claimant for the construction of Section 101-A, Route No. 124. Claimant executed the contract and bond required by the department and immediately thereafter commenced performance of the contract.

On October 21, 1931, the department notified claimant that payments for work done under the contract could not be made from the general appropriation for such work, because the Act under which the contract was awarded had been held invalid by the Supreme Court. The contract was made and the work thereunder performed in good faith, both the department and claimant believing it to be valid.

The department has stipulated and the Attorney General has approved the stipulation that the claimant is entitled to the sum of $10,956.01 for the work and claimant is therefore awarded that sum in compliance with said stipulation.

Official volume 7 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1931–June 30, 1933)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.