Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Ernest Kempf v. State of Illinois

7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 67 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1932-03-09 No. 1792
Disposition: (No. 1792-Claim dismissed.)
Cite as: Ernest Kempf v. State of Illinois, 7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 67 (1932)

ERNEST KEMPF, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant moved to dismiss the suit because the claim had been paid in full. The court granted the motion and dismissed the case.

Claim type: Other

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed upon motion of claimant. Where claimant moves to dismiss the suit for the reason that the claim has been paid case will be dismissed.

HENRY MANSFIELD AND DAVID J. COWAN, for claimant. OSCAR E. CARLSTROM, Attorney General, for respondent.

MR. JUSTICE THOMAS delivered the opinion of the court:

On March 8, 1932, comes Mansfield and Cowan, attorneys for claimant and file their written motion to dismiss suit as the claimant has been paid in full.

Motion granted and suit dismissed.

Official volume 7 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1931–June 30, 1933)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.