Legacy General 7 dismissed 1930s Palm Olive Peet Company v. State of Illinois 7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 79 1932-09-14 (No. 1334-Claim dismissed.) /opinions/v07-p0097-2/ PALM OLIVE PEET COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.
Case summary
The claimant failed to show cause why the case should not be dismissed for want of prosecution, so the court dismissed the claim without an award.
Claim type: Other
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion
text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- DISMISSAL-when case will be dismissed for want of prosecution. Where,
upon motion of Attorney General to show cause why case should not be dis-
Attorney General, and duly moves the court for dismissal,
Done in open court during the above regular session this 13th day of September, A. D. 1932.
Official volume 7 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1931–June 30, 1933)
·
All opinions in this volume
·
Also on CourtListener
This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The
PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent
opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or
closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See
About & sources.