Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Bilderback Investment Trust v. State of Illinois

7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 122 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1933-01-10 No. 1822
Disposition: (No. 1822-Claimant awarded $300.00.) Award: $300.00 Agency: Secretary of State
Cite as: Bilderback Investment Trust v. State of Illinois, 7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 122 (1933)
Legacy General 7 awarded 1930s Bilderback Investment Trust v. State of Illinois 7 Ill. Ct. Cl. 122 1933-01-10 (No. 1822-Claimant awarded $300.00.) /opinions/v07-p0140-1/

THE COMMERCIAL NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought a refund of $300.00 in franchise tax erroneously paid to the Secretary of State due to a mutual mistake of fact. The court awarded the claimant $300.00.

Claim type: Tax Refund

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. FRANCHISE TAX-when award will be made for recovery of payment made under mutual mistake of fact. Where it appears from undisputed facts that franchise tax, in excess of amount due was made through mutual mistake of fact, and Attorney General concedes that claimant is entitled to an award for such excess one will be made.

Claimant is asking for a refund of $300.00 franchise tax erroneously paid the Secretary of State on July 25, 1930.

Claimant is a non-resident corporation but did no business in Illinois during the year for which the tax was paid. Its report showed the total amount of its issued capital stock to be $7,000,000.00. The Secretary of State notified claimant that it had been assessed a franchise tax of $500.00 and claimant sent the money to pay the tax. Under the law claimant should have been taxed only $200.00. The mistake was made by the Secretary of State. It is stipulated that the excess tax was paid by mistake and the error was not discovered until after the Secretary of State had turned the money into the State treasury. It is conceded by the Attorney General that the error was a mutual mistake of fact and that claimant is entitled to an award for the excess tax paid.

Claimant is therefore allowed an award of $300.00.

Official volume 7 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1931–June 30, 1933)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.