Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Allerton v. State of Illinois

8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 218 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1934-11-13 No. 2351
Disposition: (No. 2351-Claim denied.)
Cite as: Allerton v. State of Illinois, 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 218 (1934)
Legacy General 8 denied 1930s Allerton v. State of Illinois 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 218 1934-11-13 (No. 2351-Claim denied.) /opinions/v08-p0208-1/

C. J. ALLERTON, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $51.75 for damage to his automobile when it collided with a state-operated snow plow. The court denied the claim, holding that the State is not liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior for the negligence of its employees.

Claim type: Property Damage

Cases cited: Crabtree vs. State, 7 C. C. R. 207; Morrissey vs. State, No. 2233, decided at the January term, 1934

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PROPERTY DAMAGE-negligence of State Highway Employees-State not liable for. The doctrine of respondent superior not being applicable to the State it is not liable for damages to property resulting from the negligence of its employees or agents.

On the 12th day of February, A. D. 1933, certain employees of the respondent were operating a snow plow in a southerly direction on S. B. I. Route No. 1 at a point about ten (10) miles north of Danville, Illinois. At the same time, the claimant was driving his Studebaker automobile in the same direction. Claimant avers in his complaint that the snow plow stopped suddenly and without warning to him, at a time when he was close thereto, and that as the result thereof, and by reason of the negligence of the employees of the State in the operation of said snow plow, his automobile collided with said snow plow and was damaged in the amount of $51.75.

The Attorney General has entered a motion to dismiss the case for the reason that there is no legal liability on the part of the State under the facts set forth in the complaint.

The motion of the Attorney General is based upon the rule that the State is not liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior for the negligence of its servants and agents.

That rule has been stated so often in the decisions of this court, as well as in the decision of other courts of this State, that citations seem superfluous.

There being no legal liability on the part of the State if the State were suable, this court is without jurisdiction to enter an award. Crabtree vs. State, 7 C. C. R. 207; Morrissey vs. State, No. 2233, decided at the January term, 1934 of this court.

The motion of the Attorney General must therefore be sustained and the case dismissed. Case dismissed.

Official volume 8 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1933–June 30, 1935, and advisory Opinions furnished University of Illinois)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.