Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Reed v. State of Illinois

8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 327 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1934-12-11 No. 2370
Disposition: (No. 2370-Claim denied.)
Cite as: Reed v. State of Illinois, 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 327 (1934)
Legacy General 8 denied 1930s Reed v. State of Illinois 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 327 1934-12-11 (No. 2370-Claim denied.) /opinions/v08-p0317-1/

JOSEPH H. REED, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $60 for a cow killed after workers allegedly left a gate open, but the court denied the claim because CWA workers were federal employees, not state employees, and the state is immune from respondeat superior liability for negligence.

Claim type: Property Damage

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PROPERTY DAMAGE-negligence of State employee-State not liable for. The State is not liable for the negligence of its servants or agents, the rule of respondent superior not being applicable to it.

Claimant herein asks settlement for the loss of a cow that strayed from claimant’s pasture onto S. B. I. Route No. 91 and was killed as a result of being struck down in some manner unknown to the claimant. Claimant further represents that on the day in question, i. e.-on or about February 20, 1934, workmen were employed by the Civil Works Administration in hauling stone and gravel from the pasture in question, the material being used in repairing said hard road; that an agreement existed between claimant and the workmen that they were to keep the pasture gate closed so as to prevent stock from leaving; that the workmen failed to exercise care in closing the gate and that as a result, the cow in question was injured and died with resultant damage to the claimant in the sum of Sixty Dollars ($60.00). [*328]

The Attorney General has filed a motion to dismiss the claim for the reason the declaration shows that the workmen whose negligence is complained of, were employed under the C. W. A. and were not employees of the State of Illinois.

The Civil Works Administration was provided for by an Act of Congress and the employment of all who worked therein was made through Federal channels; the State merely co-operating as a means of expediting such charitable or remedial work and labor.

The Illinois Emergency Relief Act provides as follows: It shall be the duty of the commission until March 1, 1933, to provide relief to residents of the State of Illinois in necessitous circumstances.

Such relief shall be provided by distributing funds or supplies and by any other means deemed desirable by the commission. For the purpose of carrying out the provisions of this Act, the commission may make use of and cooperate with counties, townships, and any other municipal corporations charged by law with the duty of poor relief and with other local relief agencies.

Section 2, Ill. Emergency Relief Commission. (3-1/ 1933-8/1/35) Regardless, however, of the question of who may have been the employer of the workmen in question, there could be no award properly made by this court in the claim in question, for the reason that the rule of respondent superior does not apply to the State in its sovereign capacity and the State is not liable for the negligence of its employees, agents or servants.

The motion of the Attorney General is allowed and the claim dismissed.

Official volume 8 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1933–June 30, 1935, and advisory Opinions furnished University of Illinois)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.