Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Sinclair Refining Company v. State of Illinois

8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 382 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1935-01-10 No. 2512
Disposition: (No. 2512-Claimant awarded $100.39.) Award: $100.39 Agency: Kankakee State Hospital
Cite as: Sinclair Refining Company v. State of Illinois, 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 382 (1935)
Legacy General 8 awarded 1930s Sinclair Refining Company v. State of Illinois 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 382 1935-01-10 (No. 2512-Claimant awarded $100.39.) /opinions/v08-p0372-1/

SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS. Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $100.39 for oil delivered to Kankakee State Hospital. The court found the purchase was proper and delivery made, but the appropriation had lapsed before payment. The court awarded the full amount because there was no unreasonable delay in presenting the claim.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. SUPPLIES-when award may be for price of. The facts in this case are similar to those in Shell Petroleum Corporation vs. State, 7 Court of Claims Reports, 224 and what was said therein is applicable and controlling here.

Claimant seeks to recover the sum of One Hundred Dollars and Thirty-nine Cents ($100.39) for 159.3 gallons of compound cylinder oil; 160.1 gallons bearing oil; and 29.4 gallons lard oil, purchased from it by respondent through Mr. A. W. Daily, State Purchasing Agent of the Division of Purchases and Supplies, and delivered by claimant to Kankakee State Hospital, part being delivered on February 15, 1933 and part on March 10, 1933.

The claim was not presented in time for payment out of the current appropriation, and said appropriation thereafter lapsed. When the claim was presented there were no available funds out of which payment could be made.

The oil in question was purchased by the proper authorities of the respondent, and delivery thereof was duly made.

No question is raised as to the amount of the claim or the reasonableness thereof. There is nothing in the record which indicates that the claimant has delayed unreasonably in presenting its claim, and it is therefore ordered that an award be and the same is hereby entered in favor of the claimant for the amount claimed, to-wit, One Hundred Dollars and Thirty-nine Cents ($100.39).

Official volume 8 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1933–June 30, 1935, and advisory Opinions furnished University of Illinois)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.