Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

William J. Connell v. State of Illinois

8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 452 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1935-03-13 No. 2106
Disposition: (No. 2106-Claimant awarded $500.00.) Award: $500.00 Agency: Division of Highways
Cite as: William J. Connell v. State of Illinois, 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 452 (1935)
Legacy General 8 awarded 1930s William J. Connell v. State of Illinois 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 452 1935-03-13 (No. 2106-Claimant awarded $500.00.) /opinions/v08-p0442-1/

WILLIAM J. CONNELL, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a painter employed by the State, was injured in a truck accident while riding from work. The court awarded $500 for permanent disfigurement, noting that medical expenses and lost wages were already paid.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT - non-liability of employer for accidents occurring off his premises-exception. An exception to the general rule that the employer is not liable for compensation for injuries suffered in accidents occurring off his premises, may be found where employee is accidentally injured, while returning from his labors and while riding in a vehicle provided by his employer for his transportation from said labors.

Claimant was employed by respondent at the Dixon office of the Division of Highways, as a painter, at a salary of One Hundred Eight Dollars ($108.00) per month. On June 21, 1933 while riding on a State Highway truck from the place of his work near Kewanee to the Paint Shop at Dixon, the truck collided with another automobile at an intersection of State Highways in Annawan, Illinois, and claimant was injured; the injuries consisting of a V shaped cut about two inches long on his chin; a cut on his left cheek about two inches long and the loss of three upper teeth, and the loosening of all the other upper teeth, resulting in their later removal; also a skin cut one inch long above the hair line on the right side of the forehead. All of plaintiff's medical expenses, and the cost of a new set of upper teeth have been paid for by the State, as his employer, and plaintiff has received full pay during his temporary total incapacity and is still employed by the State. He was thirty-two years of age at the time of the injury and he had two children, one aged eleven and another aged eight years. Additional compensation was claimed in the sum of "One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) for serious and permanent disfigurement to the face and head, under Paragraph 8-C of the Workmen's Compensation Act."

In his Statement, Brief and Argument, plaintiff submits the following: "The question which complainant desires to present is whether he is entitled to any further compensation for the disfigurement caused by the scars and the loss of teeth; * * * that because he still suffers severe headaches as a result of the brain concussion * * * his recovery is not complete, and this court should allow his claim to stand open so that if, at any time in the future, the consequences of the brain concussion and injuries become so serious as to amount to incapacity, complainant will not be barred from having any further award to which he may be entitled under the law."

The Statute under which claims of employees are heard by this court specifies that same shall be considered under the provisions of the Workmen's Compensation Act of Illinois. [*451]

Any question as to deferred or an increasing disability that plaintiff may desire to urge in the future will therefore be governed by the terms of that Act.

While plaintiff at the time of the accident was not at the scene of his labors but was returning therefrom, he was riding in a State truck. As the State was providing the means of conveyance, this claim comes within the exception as to non-liability of the employer for accidents occurring off the premises.

He is entitled at this time, under the proof, to an award for physical disfigurement. His counsel in their Brief and Argument state that "complainant himself is unable to compute the pecuniary measure of the injuries to him." Plaintiff's disfigurement has not in fact interfered with his employment as he is still employed by the State. Such disfigurement might well affect his opportunity for employment in a general way, however. From the evidence in the record, including the photograph appearing therein, an award of Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00) is allowed.

Official volume 8 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1933–June 30, 1935, and advisory Opinions furnished University of Illinois)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.