Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Young v. State of Illinois

8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 500 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1935-03-13 No. 2470
Disposition: (No. 2470-Claimant awarded $7.50.) Award: $7.50
Cite as: Young v. State of Illinois, 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 500 (1935)
Legacy General 8 awarded 1930s Young v. State of Illinois 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 500 1935-03-13 (No. 2470-Claimant awarded $7.50.) /opinions/v08-p0490-1/

EUGENE YOUNG, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a National Guard member, was injured in a bus fire and sought compensation. The court awarded $7.50 for one week's disability based on military board reports.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-member of Illinois National Guard-when award may be made for, under Military and Naval Code. This claim arose out of occurrence for which claim was filed and award made in case of Case vs. State, No. 2469, ante, and is governed by opinion therein.

Eugene Young was a member of the Howitzer Co. 130th Inf., I. N. G., and was in the military bus-fire accident that occurred near Pana, Illinois, on July 26, 1933. (See Case vs.

State, C. of C. 2469.)

Examination of claimant by a Military Medical Board on July 26, 1933, disclosed a bruise on his left knee with a finding that probably it would require treatment for two weeks. The report of the Military Medical Board at Camp Grant, on August 8, 1934, shows no permanent disability. In the claim which plaintiff has filed herein no specific damages are alleged, but he asks such award as the merits of his claim may demand. Under the authority of the Military Code and on the basis of the military board's reports, a minimum award for one week's disability at $7.50 is allowed.

Official volume 8 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1933–June 30, 1935, and advisory Opinions furnished University of Illinois)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.