Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Nelson et al. v. State of Illinois

8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 534 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1935-04-09 No. 2530
Disposition: (No. 2530-Claimant awarded $1,250.00.) Award: $1,250.00
Cite as: Nelson et al. v. State of Illinois, 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 534 (1935)
Legacy General 8 awarded 1930s Nelson et al. v. State of Illinois 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 534 1935-04-09 (No. 2530-Claimant awarded $1,250.00.) /opinions/v08-p0524-1/

OLE NELSON AND JOSEPHINE NELSON, Claimants, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimants sought compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act for the death of their son, an employee of the State, from an infection following a work injury. The court awarded $1,250.00 based on partial dependency.

Claim type: Wrongful Death

Statutes cited: Section 7 of the Illinois Workmen's Compensation Act

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT-when award may be made under. Where it is conceded that State employee sustained accidental injuries, resulting in his death, arising out of and in the course of his employment, while engaged in extra-hazardous employment, an award for compensation will be made to his dependents in accordance with the provisions of the Act.

Claimants ask for compensation "In accordance with Section 7 of the Illinois Workmen's Compensation Act" for the death of their son, Harry Nelson, through accidental injuries sustained while the latter was an employee of the State of Illinois.

Said employee was working as an Assistant Engineer and in attempting to loosen a stake used in grade work on a paving project he injured his foot and ankle from which an infection developed, and as a result thereof and from pneumonia incident thereto, he died on July 11, 1934. The record discloses that Harry Nelson was unmarried and left surviving him his father, Ole Nelson, and his mother, Josephine Nelson; also three unmarried sisters. The father had been a structural iron worker but had been able to obtain only a small amount of work for two or three years before the death of the son.

The record further shows that the three unmarried daughters were all working and contributed approximately two-thirds of the income received by the father and mother, and the son contributed approximately one-third of such income; the mother testifying "My income was around $1,500.00 * * * the son averaging around $500.00 or a little better." (Record page 23.)

The earnings of the deceased son were One Thousand Eight Hundred Dollars ($1,800.00) per year.

Section 7 of the Workmen's Compensation Act provides that the amount of compensation payable for injury resulting in the death of an employee shall be as follows: [*535] "(c) If no amount is payable under Paragraph (a) or (b) of this section and the employee leaves any parent or parents-who at the time of the injury were partially dependent upon the earnings of the employee, then such proportion of a sum equal to four times the average annual earnings of the employee as such dependency bears to total dependency, but not less in any event than $1,000.00 and not more in any event than $3,750.00."

In his Statement, Brief and Argument, counsel for plaintiffs contends that under the foregoing state of proof, claimants are entitled to an award of One Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Dollars ($1,250.00) that being on the basis of one-third of the maximum amount provided by the Workmen's Compensation Act. Counsel for respondent concedes that such amount is due and the record supports the claim.

An award is therefore made in favor of Ole Nelson and Josephine Nelson jointly in the sum of One Thousand Two

Hundred Fifty Dollars ($1,250.00.)

Official volume 8 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1933–June 30, 1935, and advisory Opinions furnished University of Illinois)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.