Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Miller v. State of Illinois

8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 555 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1935-04-30 No. 2622
Disposition: (No. 2622-Claim denied.) Agency: Illinois National Guard
Cite as: Miller v. State of Illinois, 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 555 (1935)
Legacy General 8 denied 1930s Miller v. State of Illinois 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 555 1935-04-30 (No. 2622-Claim denied.) /opinions/v08-p0545-1/

GEORGE FRED MILLER, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought compensation for injuries sustained while serving in the Illinois National Guard. The court dismissed the claim as barred by the five-year statute of limitations because it was filed more than five years after the claim accrued.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

Statutes cited: Section 10 of the Act creating the Court of Claims

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. PERSONAL INJURY-limitations-when claim barred. When a claim is not filed within five years after it first accrues, plea of Statute of Limitations will be sustained and case dismissed.

Plaintiff herein seeks an award from the State for injuries alleged to have been suffered by him while serving as a private in Troop E, 106th Cavalry of the Illinois National Guard. The complaint alleges that on August 2, 1926 a horse that plaintiff was riding while engaged in his military duties became unmanageable and fell, with its full weight upon claimant's right foot and leg, causing injuries to the bone of the leg and foot; that he learned on November 26, 1929 that the injury to his foot and leg was or might be of a permanent nature. Plaintiff states that on December 25, 1929 he was advised by his uncle, D. T. McNish, a past officer of the American Legion that if he had a permanent injury he should make a claim with the State of Illinois for compensation; that on March 7, 1930 he wrote to the Hon. Carlos E. Black, Adjutant General of the State of Illinois, setting forth the nature of his permanent injuries and asked what should be done to obtain compensation; that on March 11, 1930 the Adjutant General wrote instructing him to obtain the services of an attorney and present his claim for compensation to the Court of Claims, Springfield, Illinois; that on said date of March 11, 1930 plaintiff moved from his home at Champaign, Illinois to Mansfield, Illinois, where he resided for approximately five months, and for which change of address no forwarding instructions were given to the Champaign Post Office for several days subsequent to March 11th.

The instructions contained in the Adjutant General's letter finally came to plaintiff's attention however according to his complaint, for in September, 1931 he talked with Capt.

Gehr and was then advised by the latter that it would be [*556] necessary for him to obtain the services of an attorney to present his claim to the Court of Claims, and was then shown a copy of the Adjutant General's letter of March 11, 1930.

Plaintiff states that in July 1934 he secured the services of an attorney for the purpose of presenting his claim to the Court of Claims and again talked with Capt. Gehr about the matter; that correspondence was again had with the Adjutant General's Office and the instructions contained in the latter's letter of March 11, 1930 were communicated anew to claimant; said communication being turned over to plaintiff by his attorney.

Eventually on March 1, 1935 this claim was filed.

Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss the claim under the provisions of Section 10 of the Act creating the Court of Claims which provides: "Every claim against the State, cognizable by the Court of Claims, shall be forever barred unless the claim is filed with the Secretary of the Court within five years after the claim first accrues."

Plaintiff was fully advised and had ample opportunity to file his claim within the time-limit provided by law. Having failed to do so and not coming within any exception to the provisions of said limitation, the motion by respondent is allowed and the claim is dismissed.

Official volume 8 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1933–June 30, 1935, and advisory Opinions furnished University of Illinois)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.