Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Scruggs-Vandervoort-Barney D. G. Co. v. State of Illinois

8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 601 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1935-05-31 No. 2284
Disposition: (No. 2284-Claimant awarded $76.50.) Award: $76.50 Agency: Southern Illinois Penitentiary at Menard
Cite as: Scruggs-Vandervoort-Barney D. G. Co. v. State of Illinois, 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 601 (1935)
Legacy General 8 awarded 1930s Scruggs-Vandervoort-Barney D. G. Co. v. State of Illinois 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 601 1935-05-31 (No. 2284-Claimant awarded $76.50.) /opinions/v08-p0591-1/

SCRUGGS-VANDERVOORT-BARNEY D. G. CO., ACORPORATION, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for merchandise sold to the penitentiary. The court found legal authority for the purchase and delivery, and awarded the full amount claimed.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. SUPPLIES-when award made for. Where it appears that there was legal authority for purchase of supplies and that same were delivered to and received by State, an award will be made for amount due therefor.

This claim was filed December 5, 1933 and claimant alleges that during the five years prior thereto it had sold [*602] various articles of merchandise to the Southern Illinois Penitentiary at Menard, Illinois, for all of which it had been paid except the items making up this claim; that on or about December 30, 1932 claimant, at the request of Mrs. Edna Tindall, matron of the penitentiary, sold and delivered to that institution merchandise, as per Bill of Particulars attached, to the value of Seventy-six and 50/100 Dollars ($76.50); that the claim was approved by the warden but was not approved by the Department of Finance, the latter stating that the prices charged for certain items in the bill were excessive; whereupon, at the suggestion of the present Warden, Joseph E. Ragen, the claim was filed herein, although the items in question were purchased before Mr. Ragen became warden.

No contention of law or fact is raised by respondent.

There was legal authority for the purchase, and the merchandise was duly delivered. The court is of the opinion the claim should be allowed.

An Award is Therefore Made in favor of claimant in the sum of Seventy-six and 50/100 Dollars ($76.50).

Official volume 8 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1933–June 30, 1935, and advisory Opinions furnished University of Illinois)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.