Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Reece v. State of Illinois

8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 717 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1935-06-01 No. 2550
Disposition: (No. 2550-Claimant awarded $10.00.) Award: $10.00 Agency: Southern Illinois Penitentiary
Cite as: Reece v. State of Illinois, 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 717 (1935)
Legacy General 8 awarded 1930s Reece v. State of Illinois 8 Ill. Ct. Cl. 717 1935-06-01 (No. 2550-Claimant awarded $10.00.) /opinions/v08-p0707-1/

J. A. REECE, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a state employee, sought compensation for a fractured fibula suffered on the job. The court found the facts undisputed and awarded $10.00.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. Syllabus - when award may be made for. Where facts are undisputed that claimant rendered necessary medical services at request of State officer, to State employee injured while in the performance of his duties, charge for which is reasonable, an award for payment may be made.

This claim was filed pro se December 7, 1934. Claimant states he was employed by the State as Superintendent of Quarries at the Southern Illinois Penitentiary, and that his employment required him to be subject to call at any hour of the 24 hours of the day.

It appears that on June 6, 1933 he suffered a fracture of the right fibula two inches above the ankle; that at that time the Southern Illinois Penitentiary did not have an X-ray machine. The Institution doctor was called to reduce the fracture, and he recommended an X-ray be taken. Claimant was conveyed to the office of Dr. B. E. Gilster at Chester, where an X-ray was taken. An effort was made to reimburse the doctor. The facts are undisputed.

We, therefore, make an award in the sum of $10.00 in favor of claimant.

Official volume 8 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed between July 1, 1933–June 30, 1935, and advisory Opinions furnished University of Illinois)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.