Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Thomas Korando v. State of Illinois

11 Ill. Ct. Cl. 193 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1940-02-14 No. 2544
Disposition: (No. 2544-Claim denied.) Agency: Southern Illinois Penitentiary at Menard
Cite as: Thomas Korando v. State of Illinois, 11 Ill. Ct. Cl. 193 (1940)
Legacy General 11 denied 1940s Thomas Korando v. State of Illinois 11 Ill. Ct. Cl. 193 1940-02-14 (No. 2544-Claim denied.) /opinions/v11-p0212-1/

THOMAS KORANDO, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought compensation for a permanent partial disability from a knife wound suffered while butchering at the penitentiary farm. The court dismissed the claim because it was filed more than six months after the accident, making it untimely under the Workmen's Compensation Act.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

Statutes cited: Section 24 of the Workmen's Compensation Act

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT-limitations in claims under-making claim for compensation and filing application therefor within time fixed by Section 24 of Act, condition precedent to jurisdiction of Court. Where the record discloses that no claim or demand for compensation was made by employee, within six months after date of accident, nor any application made -7 therefor within one year after date of injury, no compensation having been paid by employer, the Court is without jurisdiction to proceed with hearing on claim Aied thereafter and same must be dismissed.

Thomas Korando filed his complaint on November 26, 1934, alleging that on the 30th day of June, 1933, he was employed by the State of Illinois as a guard of rank two at the Southern Illinois Penitentiary at Menard, Illinois; that his employment required him to work on the farm of the said penitentiary and to assist with the slaughtering and butchering of cattle and hogs; that on the 30th day of June, 1933, while engaged in the line of his employment, which required him to butcher a beef, and while preparing to stick the beef, the animal threw its head to one side and the knife went into claimant's left arm about four inches above the wrist joint on the inside of the arm where it severed the main artery cutting off the main blood supply to the arm and hand and where it cut off and severed the muscle in the arm; that because of the injury his hand and arm are numb and he has very little feeling in either his hand or arm; that he is unable to do any hard work or heavy lifting with his arm, and is unable to perform his daily duties around the farm that he was able to perform prior to said injury; that he has permanently lost the partial use of his hand and arm by reason of the injury.

Claimant further alleged that prior to the time of the injury he was earning $25.96 per week, and he claims $3,504.60 damages, which is for the permanent partial disability under which he was placed by reason of the injury.

The Attorney General made a motion to strike the claim for the reason that no claim for compensation was made within six months after the accident, and that by reason of the limitations contained in Section 24 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, this claim is barred.

If this court has any jurisdiction, it is under the Compensation Act. Approximately one year and five months elapsed from the time of the injury until the claim was filed.

Section 24 of the Workmen's Compensation Act provides that no proceedings for compensation under said Act shall be maintained unless claim for compensation has been made within six months after the accident, and unless application for compensation is filed with the Industrial Commission [*195] within one year after the date of the injury or within one year after the date of the last payment of compensation. No compensation was ever paid to claimant.

It has been repeatedly held by this court and the Supreme Court of Illinois that the filing of the claim within the year as above set forth is jurisdictional. More than a year having elapsed, this court has no jurisdiction to entertain the claim.

The motion of the Attorney General mill, therefore, be sustained and the cause dismissed.

Official volume 11 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between July 1, 1939–June 30, 1941, and advisory Opinions furnished Illinois Emergency Relief Commission)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.