EVERETT K. BROKER, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.
Case summary
Claimant sought payment for gasoline and oil sold to the Highway Division. The court awarded the claim because the bill was not paid due to claimant's lack of understanding of procedure, and sufficient funds were available in the appropriation.
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- SUPPLIES-lapse of appropriation out of which could be paid-before presentment of bill-when award may be made for price of. Where it appears that State received merchandise, as ordered by it, and that bill therefor, in correct amount was not presented before lapse of appropriation out of which it could be paid, due to no negligence on part of claimant, an award may be made for amount due on claim filed within a reasonable time.
During the calendar year 1937, claimant was sole proprietor of a service station in Mt. Pulaski, Illinois. At the request of the Department of Public Works and Buildings, Highway Division of Illinois, he made various sales and deliveries of gasoline and oil to that Department through its representative and agents. Duplicate invoices of the several sales are attached to the original bill of claimant, and amount to $43.35. [*278]
Claimant represents that his account has never been paid and that there is now due him from the State of Illinois the said sum of $43.35. A report from the Division of Highways recites that, “Through a lack of understanding by the claimant of the procedure prescribed and required by the division of highways for payment of bills, his bills were not paid from money then available in the 60th biennium appropriation.
The quantities are correct, the prices are as agreed upon, and the supplies were furnished as claimed.”
No objection is made by respondent to the allowance of the claim as submitted.
We have held in numerous cases that where materials or supplies have been furnished to the State but the bill therefor was not approved and vouchered for payment before the lapse of the appropriation from which it was payable, without negligence on the part of the claimant, an award will be made, if, at the time the expense was incurred there were sufficient funds remaining unexpended in the appropriation to pay for same. This claim is within the requirements, and an award is therefore entered in favor of claimant for the sum of $43.35.