Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Meriel Heath v. State of Illinois

12 Ill. Ct. Cl. 155 Illinois Court of Claims Filed J u n e 15, 1942 No. 3661
Disposition: (No. 3661-Claim denied.) Agency: Illinois School for the Deaf
Cite as: Meriel Heath v. State of Illinois, 12 Ill. Ct. Cl. 155 (1942)
Legacy General 12 denied 1940s Meriel Heath v. State of Illinois 12 Ill. Ct. Cl. 155 J u n e 15, 1942 (No. 3661-Claim denied.) /opinions/v12-p0172-1/

MERIEL HEATH, AMINOR, BY GEORGE HEATH, HER FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a minor inmate of the Illinois School for the Deaf, sought damages for personal injuries when a fire escape fell on her, alleging negligence. The court dismissed the claim, holding that the State is not liable for negligence of its employees in a governmental function and that no award could be made solely on equity and good conscience.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

MERIEL HEATH, A MINOR, BY GEORGE HEATH, HER FATHER AND NEXT FRIEND, Claimant, us. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Opinion filed June 15, 1942.

GRAHAM & GRAHAM AND FORTH & FORTH, for claimant.

GEORGE F. BARRETT, Attorney General ; GLENN A. TREVOR, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Nmu(I-mc&ficers, agents or employees of The Illino’is Xchool for The Deaf - claim by inmate of .for personal imjjzbries resulting from - State not liable for-award for on grownds of equaty and good conscience cannot be made. The maintenance and conduct of Charitable Institutions is a purely governmental function, to which the rule of respondeat superior does not apply, and the State is not liable to respond in damages to an inmate of The Illinois School for The Deaf, same being a State Charitable Institution, for personal injuries sustained by her, as the result of the negligence of the officers, agents or employees thereof, and no award can be made therefor under any theory of law or equity.

FISHER, 5.

Complaint was filed on November 12, 1941, by Muriel Heath, a minor of the age of fourteen years, by George Heath, - her father and next friend, alleging among other things that claimant, a minor of the age of fourteen years, was deaf, and with other deaf children was an inmate of the Illinois School for the Deaf which was owned and controlled by respondent; that on April 26, 1941, vhile claimant was playing upon the grounds surrounding said buildings a fire escape fell and [*156] struck the claimant and caused her to be injured; that the said injury resulted Erom the negligence of the respondent in not keeping the said fire escape in a reasonably safe condition.

Claimant seeks damages in the sum of Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00).

Respondent has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds7 1 1. That the claimant’s complaint does not set forth a claim which the State of Illinois as a sovereign commonwealth should discharge and pay for the reason that therein claimant seeks an award for alleged injuries sustained by her while she was a student at “The Illinois School for the Deaf” in the city of Jacksonville, Illinois, and a ward of the State of Illinois in said school, occasioned by the alleged negligence of the respondent. 2. That an award cannot be made by the Court of Claims solely on the- basis of equity and good conscience, where there is no legal basis for such an award. 3. That the complaint does not comply with Rules 5 ( a ) , , 5(b) and 6(a) of the Court of Claims.

The complaint in this case does not comply with Rules 5 (a), 5 (b) and 6 (a) of the Court of Claims, but since the complaint could be amended to conform with the rules it is im’material that they be considered, inasmuch as! the court is of the opinion that no award could be made in this claim on its merits.

This court has repeatedly held that the State, in the exercise of its governmental functions, is not liable for injuries resulting from the negligence of its servants, agents or employees. This court has also held that the doctrine of respondent superior does not apply; also that an award cannot be made solely on the basis of equity and good conscience in the absence of a legal or equitable basis on which an award could be made. respondent,^ motion to dismiss is sustained, and the claim is hereby dismissed.[*157]

Official volume 12 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1941–June 30, 1943)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.