Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Henry Koppein v. State of Illinois

12 Ill. Ct. Cl. 395 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1942-03-09 No. 3763
Disposition: (No. 3763-Claimant awarded $15.27.) Award: $15.27 Agency: Highway Division of the Department of Public Works and Buildings
Cite as: Henry Koppein v. State of Illinois, 12 Ill. Ct. Cl. 395 (1942)
Legacy General 12 awarded 1940s Henry Koppein v. State of Illinois 12 Ill. Ct. Cl. 395 1942-03-09 (No. 3763-Claimant awarded $15.27.) /opinions/v12-p0412-1/

HENRY KOPPEIN, DOING BUSINESS AS KOPPEIN AND COMPANY AND AS KOPPEIN’SSERVICE, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sold gasoline and kerosene to the Highway Division, but the invoice was not scheduled in time for payment before the appropriation lapsed. The court awarded $15.27 because the materials were properly furnished and sufficient funds were available at the time the expenses were incurred.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. GEORGE E’. BARRETT, Attorney General; ROBERT V. OSTROM,Assistant Attorney General, f o r respondent.
  2. SuPPLrm-lapse of appropriation before payment-wflcient unexpended balance in-when award m a y be made f o r valzie of. Where merchandise is sold to the State, on its order, and received by i t and claimant submits a bill in the correct amount therefor within a reasonable time, and due to no fault , o r negligence on his part, same is not approved and vouchered for payment before lapse of appropriation from which it is payable, an award may be made for the value thereof, where at the time same was furnished there were sufficient funds remaining therein to pay same.

Claimant sold to respondent for the Highway Division of the Department of Public Works and Buildings at Eleroy, Illinois, the following merchandise : [*396] May 7, 1941-60 Gallons of Kerosene................................... $9.00 May 17, 1941-13 Gallons of Gasoline................................... 2.33 May 21, 1941-10 Gallons of Gasoline................................... 1.79 May 22, 1941-12 Gallons of Gasoline................................... 2.15 Total............................................................ $15.27 Claim for $15.27 was filed on November 9, 1942, and, by stipulation between claimant and respondent mas filed a report of the Division of Highways, by M. K. Lingle, which report admits that, “The above claim arose as a result of claimant having furnished gasoline and kerosene to the Division of Highways and not scheduling its invoice in time to be paid in due course. The quantities of materials shown on the copies of invoices included in the complaint as exhibits are correct, the prices are as previously agreed upon, the delivery dates correct, and the materials were received and used by the Division of Highways. An appropriation was in existence and moneys available therein for payment of claimant’s invoices had they been scheduled in apt time.”

We have heretofore held that where materials or supplies have been properly furnished to the State and a bill therefor has-been submitted within a reasonable time, but the same was not approved and vouchered for payment before the lapse of the appropriation from which it is payable, without any fault or neglect on the part of the claimant, an award for the reasonable value of such materials or supplies will be made, where, at the time the expenses were incurred there were sufficient funds remaining unexpended in the appropriation to pay for the same.

An award is therefore entered in favor of the claimant, Henry Koppein, doing business as Koppein and Company and as Koppein’s Service, in the sum of Fifteen and Twenty-seven/One Hundredth Dollars ($15.27).

Official volume 12 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1941–June 30, 1943)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.