Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

William Eggert v. State of Illinois

17 Ill. Ct. Cl. 43 Illinois Court of Claims Filed September 18, 1947. No. 4000
Disposition: (No. 4000-Claimant awarded $208.55.) Award: $208.55 Agency: Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Highways
Cite as: William Eggert v. State of Illinois, 17 Ill. Ct. Cl. 43 (1947)
Legacy General 17 awarded 1940s William Eggert v. State of Illinois 17 Ill. Ct. Cl. 43 September 18, 1947. (No. 4000-Claimant awarded $208.55.) /opinions/v17-p0061-1/

WILLIAM EGGERT, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant, a laborer, suffered amputation of the distal phalanx of his right third finger while loading drums. The court awarded $208.55 for temporary total disability and permanent partial loss, subject to gubernatorial approval.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

Statutes cited: Workmen's Compensation Act

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. A RTHUR NEBEL,Assistant Attorney General, f o r Re-

WILLIAM EGGERT, Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Opznioit filed September 18, 1947.

PHILIP J. SCHLAGENHAUF,

for claimant.

GEORGE I?. BARRETT, Attorney General, and

A RTHUR NEBEL,Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

I

WORKMEN’S COMPEN SAT ION ACT. Employee of the Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Highways, entitled to temporary total disability and permanent partial loss of his right third finger, upon compliance with the terms of act.

. C. J.

ECKERT,

On June 11, 1946, the claimant, William Eggert, employed ,by the respondent as a laborer in the Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Highw q s , while engaged in loading drums of bituminoub material onto a truck near Goodfield, Woodford County, Illinois, caught his right third finger between a falling drum and a drum lying on the ground. Immediately after the accident, he was taken to the Eureka Hospital, [*44]

Eureka, Illinois, where it was found necessary to ampu

tate the distal phalanx of this finger.

‘At the time of the accident, the employer and the

employee were operating under the provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of this State, and iiotice of the accident and claim for compensation were made within the time provided by the Act. The earnings of the claimant at the time of the injury were 75c per hour for an eight hour day, and employees of the respondent eiigaged in similar capacity worked less than 200 days per year. Claimant’s compensation rate is, therefore, $11.54. The injury having occurred after July 1, 1945, this must be increased 2076, making a compensation rate of $13.85 per week.

The report of the Division of Highways shows that claimant was wholly incapacitated from June 12, 1946, to September 4, 1946, a period of twelve weeks. Claimant was paid compensation for that period in the amoiiiit of $130.78. He was entitled, however, to compensation for temporary total disability in the amount of $166.20, so that there is due claimant a balance of $35.42 on account of temporary total disability.

Claimant is also entitled to an award for the loss of the distal phalanx of his right third finger, or an award of $13.85 for a period of 12$$ weeks, being in the aggregate $173.13.

An award is, therefore, entered in favor of the claimant in the amount of $208.55, all of which has accrued and is payable forthwith. . This award is subject to the approval of the Governor as provided in Section 3 of “An Act concerning the payment of compensation awards to State employees. ”

Official volume 17 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1947–June 30, 1948)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.