Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Harry C. Jewsbury v. ’illinois

19 Ill. Ct. Cl. 204 Illinois Court of Claims Filed May 9, 1950 No. 4255
Disposition: (No. 4255-Claim denied.) Agency: State Highway Department
Cite as: Harry C. Jewsbury v. ’illinois, 19 Ill. Ct. Cl. 204 (1950)
Legacy General 19 denied 1950s Harry C. Jewsbury v. ’illinois 19 Ill. Ct. Cl. 204 May 9, 1950 (No. 4255-Claim denied.) /opinions/v19-p0223-1/

Harry C. Jewsbury, Claimant, v. State of ’Illinois, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought compensation for a back injury sustained in 1941 while operating a road grader pulled by a State highway truck. The court dismissed the claim because claimant failed to file within the one-year period required by Section 24 of the Workmen's Compensation Act.

Claim type: Personal Injury Negligence

Statutes cited: Section 24 of the Workmen's Compensation Act of this State

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. Workmen’s Compensation Act-where claim under Act will be denied. Where claimant, operating a road grader, fell backward off the grader on May 21, 1941, injuring his back, but continued to work for the Highway Department until June, 1948, when he was operated on for correction of the injury, and where he filed his claim for compensation on December 27, 1949, his claim will be denied for failure to file application for compensation within one (1) year.

This complaint filed December 27, 1949, alleges that claimant, Harry C. Jewsbury, was injured by reason of an accident occurring on the 21st day of May, 1941, while claimant was engaged in operating a road grader which was being pulled by a State highway truck. The grader started suddenly, throwing claimant backward off of the grader to the ground, injuring the back of the claimant. After receiving the injury on May 21, 1941, the claimant continued to work for the State Highway Department until he was forced to resign his position in June of 1948, when he was forced to undergo surgery for the correction of the back injury.

The record consists of the complaint, motion of respondent to dismiss, notice to call up motion to dismiss, claimant’s reply to respondent’s motion to dismiss.

It appears from the record that claimant has failed [*205] to comply with Section 24 of the Workmen's Compensation Act of this-State, which. provides that no proceedings for compensation under the Act shall be maintained unless claim for compensation has been made within six months after the accident, and unless application for compensation is filed within one year after the date of the injury, where no compensation has been paid, or within one year after the date of the last payment of compensation, where any has been paid. Failure to file complaint within the one year period under Section 24 bars the right to file such application thereafter. The motion of the Attorney General to dismiss is hereby allowed.

Complaint dismissed.

Official volume 19 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1949–June 30, 1950)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.