Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Sinclair Refining Company v. State of Illinois

20 Ill. Ct. Cl. 282 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1951-04-10 No. 4400
Disposition: (No. 4400-Claimant awarded $366.11.) Award: $366.11 Agency: Division of Highways, Division of Waterways
Cite as: Sinclair Refining Company v. State of Illinois, 20 Ill. Ct. Cl. 282 (1951)
Legacy General 20 awarded 1950s Sinclair Refining Company v. State of Illinois 20 Ill. Ct. Cl. 282 1951-04-10 (No. 4400-Claimant awarded $366.11.) /opinions/v20-p0304-1/

SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, AMAINE CORPORATION, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant furnished gasoline to the Division of Highways and Division of Waterways of the State of Illinois. Payment was refused due to lapse of appropriations. The court awarded the amount claimed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES-regularly purchased and received by the Division of Highways of the State of Illinois allowed for at the price contracted, where the appropriation therefor had lapsed. Where the claimant furnished gasoline to the Division of Highways of the State of Illinois, the purchase of which was duly authorized, and has not received payment because of a lapse of appropriations, Court held that claimant was entitled to an award.

Claimant, Sinclair Refining Company, a corporation, on various dates during periods from July 10, 1948 through June 30, 1949, furnished gasoline to the Division [*283] of Highways of the State of Illinois in the usual course of business in the amount of $284.97.

Claimant also furnished gasoline in the same manner to the Division of Waterways of the State of Illinois in the amount of $81.14.

It is agreed all of the gasoline was furnished, but payment was refused because of lapse of appropriations.

It has been repeatedly held by this Court that under the factual situation presented, an award for the amount may be made.

An award is, therefore, entered in favor of claimant in the amount of $366.11.

Official volume 20 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1950–June 30, 1951)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.