Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Tm County of Will v. State of Illinois

23 Ill. Ct. Cl. 11 Illinois Court of Claims Filed October 22, 1958 No. 4817
Disposition: (No. 4817-Claimant awarded $989.00.) Award: $989.00
Cite as: Tm County of Will v. State of Illinois, 23 Ill. Ct. Cl. 11 (1958)
Legacy General 23 awarded 1950s Tm County of Will v. State of Illinois 23 Ill. Ct. Cl. 11 October 22, 1958 (No. 4817-Claimant awarded $989.00.) /opinions/v23-p0040-1/

Tm COUNTY OF WILL, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respoilden t.

Case summary

The County of Will sought reimbursement for expenses incurred from habeas corpus petitions filed by non-resident inmates of the Illinois State Penitentiary. The court awarded $989.00 based on statutory provisions for such reimbursements.

Claim type: Other

Statutes cited: Ill. Rev. Stats., 1957, Chap. 65, Secs. 37-39; Chap. 37, Sec. 439.8; Chap. 53, Sec. 31

Cases cited: The County of Randolph vs. State of Illinois, 21 C.C.R. 427; The County of Will vs. State of Illinois, 18 C.C.R. 189

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. COUNTIES-reimbUrSemenf for writs of habeas corfius in forma Pauperis.

FmNIi 13. MASTERS, JR., Attorney for Claimant.

LATHAM CASTLE, Attorney General; SAMUEL J. DOY, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

COUNTIES-reimbUrSemenf for writs of habeas corfius in forma Pauperis. Upon stipulation of facts and expenses, an award was entered pursuant to 111. Rev. Stats., 1957, Chap. 65, Secs. 37-39; and Chap. 37, Sec. 439.8.

FEARER, J .

A claim 011 behalf of The County of Will of the State of Illinois was filed by Meade Baltz, Chairman of the Board of Supervisors of said County, by and through Frank H. Masters, Jr., State's Attorney of said Will [*12]

County, seeking to recover from respondent the sum of

$989.00.

The record consists of the following :

1. Complaint.

2 . Stipulation.

3. Joint motion of claimant and respondent for leave to waive the filing

of briefs and oral argument.

4. Order of the Chief Justice granting the joint~motionof claimant and

respondent for leave to waive the filing of briefs and oral argument,

and further ordering the case taken under advisement on the present

record.

The action is predicated on specific statutes, which confer jurisdiction on the Court of Claims to hear cases brought thereunder. (Ill. Rev. Stats., Chap. 65, Sees. 37, 38 and 39; Chap. 37, See. 439.8.) The statutes referred to herein provide for reimbursing certain counties in Illinois for expenses, costs and fees incurred because of petitions for writs of habeas corpus in forma pauperis filed therein. The petitioners are non-residents of the county in which the petitions were1 filed.

This Court has had occasion to pass upon similar cases. (The County of Rmdolph vs. State of Illiwois, 21 C.C.R. 427, and The County of Will vs. State of Illinois,

18 C.C.R. 189.)

A stipulation of the facts was entered into and filed herein, as follows :

“It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between the parties through their respective attorneys, as follows:

1. That The County of Will of the State of Illinois has situated within its borders the Illinois State Penitentiary, a penal institution of the State of Illinois.

2 . That the petitions for writs of habeas corpus, set forth in claimant’s complaint as exhibit A, have been filed in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois.

3. That said petitions were filed by inmates of the Illinois State Penitentiary, who were not residents of The County of Will of the State of Illinois at the time of their commitment, and were not committed by any court of The County of Will.

[*13] 4. That Sec. 31, Chap. 53, 111. Rev. Stats., provides that the fee of the Clerk of the Circuit Courf shall be $10.00 as to each petition for a writ of habeas corpus filed with such Clerk.

5. That Secs. 37, 38 and 39, Chap. 65, 111. Rev. Stats., provide that the State of Illinois shall assume and pay to each county the necessary expenses incurred by it and its officers, either by means of services rendered or otherwise by reason of court proceedings in such counties involving petitions for writs of habeas corpus by such inmates as above mentioned.

6. That, in addition to thq services of the Clerk of the Circuit Court rendered in said matters, there were also incurred expenses for preparing and furnishing the petitions of such matters, photostatic copies of court records and documents as set forth in claimant’s exhibit A of the complaint heretofore filed.

7 . That the claim of The County of Will against the State of Illinois for its necessary expenses is in the sum of $989.00.

8. That this claim has never been presented to any State department or officer, or to any person, corporation or tribunal.

9. That no assignmenk or transfer of this claim, or any part thereof, or interest therein has been made.”

The Clerk of the Circuit Court of Will County is entitled to receive $10.00 for each petition filed, or the sum of $950.00. (Chap. 53, See. 31, Ill. Rev. Stats.)

In addition thereto, The County of Will has expended $39.00 for copies of petitions furnished to the Attorney General and expenses in connection therewith, all in accordance with exhibit A attached to the complaint filed herein.

Claims of this kind have been passed upon by the Court of Claims before, and all have been in conformity with the statutes of the State of Illinois, as hereinabove stated.

An award is, therefore, entered herein in favor of The County of Will in the sum of $989.00.

Official volume 23 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: September 1, 1958–June 30, 1960)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.