Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

Texaco v. Ixtinots

24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 50 Illinois Court of Claims Filed November 16, 1960 No. 4899
Disposition: (No. 4899-Claimant awarded $281.00). Award: $281.00
Cite as: Texaco v. Ixtinots, 24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 50 (1960)
Lapsed Appropriation 24 awarded 1960s Texaco v. Ixtinots 24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 50 November 16, 1960 (No. 4899-Claimant awarded $281.00). /opinions/v24-p0093-1/

Texaco, INnc., formerly named the Texas Company, a Delaware Corporation, Claimant, v. State or Ixtinots, Respondent.

Headnotes

  1. Conrracrs-lapsed appropriation. Where evidence showed that the only reason claim was not paid was due to the fact that, prior to the time a statement was presented, the appropriation lapsed, an award will be made.
  2. PRACTICE AND ProcEeDuRE-stipulation in lieu of record. Court will consider case on Departmental Report where it is stipulated by the parties to constitute the record in the case.

A claim in the amount of $281.00 for merchandise purchased by respondent was filed on January 29, 1960.

Attached to the complaint is purchase order No. 345363 given to claimant by the Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Highways.

A joint motion has been filed submitting this matter on stipulation, which in substance is as follows:

(1) That the report of the Department of Public Works and Buildings, Division of Highways, shall constitute the record in this case; (2) That claimant’s claim totalling $281.00 is justly due and owing to claimant by respondent; (3) That the instrument is intended solely as a stipulation of the facts, or some of them, relating to the claim, and was executed for the purpose of avoiding the necessity of taking evidence with reference to such facts.

Based upon the stipulation and the Departmental Report filed herein, an award is hereby made to claimant in the amount of $281.00.

Official volume 24 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: November 16, 1960–August 20, 1964)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.