Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

Cerntrat Y. M. C. a. Hicu Scuoots v. Ittrnois

24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 205 Illinois Court of Claims Filed February 23, 1962 No. 4942
Disposition: (No. 4942-Claimant awarded $229.60.) Award: $229.60
Cite as: Cerntrat Y. M. C. a. Hicu Scuoots v. Ittrnois, 24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 205 (1962)
Lapsed Appropriation 24 awarded 1960s Cerntrat Y. M. C. a. Hicu Scuoots v. Ittrnois 24 Ill. Ct. Cl. 205 February 23, 1962 (No. 4942-Claimant awarded $229.60.) /opinions/v24-p0250-1/

Cerntrat Y. M. C. A. Hicu Scuoots, Claimant, v. SraTe or Ittrnois, Respondent.

Headnotes

  1. Contracts-lapsed appropriation. Where evidence showed that the only reason claim was not paid was due to the fact that, prior to the time a statement was presented, the appropriation lapsed, an award will be made.

Claimant, Shirley Briggs, through her assignee, the Central Y.M.C.A. High Schools, submitted a claim for tuition and school materials. Claimant is a blind girl, and is entitled to vocational rehabilitation as a disabled person under Chap. 23, Sees. 3431 to 3439 of the Ill. Rev.

Stats.

The Central Y.M.C.A. High Schools provided tuition and school materials for claimant, and now claims the amount of $229.60 therefor. This amount was substantiated by invoice vouchers attached to the complaint, which showed that $217.00 for tuition and $12.60 for school materials were due and owing for the period of January 23, 1959 through June 20, 1959. The only reason for nonpayment of this claim by respondent was lapse of the appropriation. At the time the appropriation lapsed there were sufficient unexpended funds available to cover the amount of the claim in the Vocational Rehabilitation Fund.

Claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $229.60.

Official volume 24 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: November 16, 1960–August 20, 1964)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.