Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Foster-Western Pharmacy v. State of Illinois

25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 11 Illinois Court of Claims Filed September 25, 1964 No. 5072
Disposition: (No. 5072-Claimant awarded $13,459.95.) Award: $13,459.95 Agency: Illinois Public Aid Commission
Cite as: Foster-Western Pharmacy v. State of Illinois, 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 11 (1964)
Legacy General 25 awarded 1960s Foster-Western Pharmacy v. State of Illinois 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 11 September 25, 1964 (No. 5072-Claimant awarded $13,459.95.) /opinions/v25-p0044-1/

FOSTER-WESTERN PHARMACY, INC., Claimant, os. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for pharmaceutical supplies furnished to Illinois Public Aid recipients. The court awarded $13,459.95 because the only reason the claim was not paid was that the appropriation had lapsed before the bill was presented.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

Cases cited: Continental Oil Company vs. State of Illinois, 23 C.C.R. 70; M. J. Holleran, Inc., vs. State of Illinois, 23 C.C.R. 17

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. FOSTER-WESTERN PHARMACY, INC., Claimant, os. STATE OF

IRWIN BLOOM, Attorney for Claimant.

WILLIAM G. CLARK, Attorney General; GERALD S. GROBMAN, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

CoNTmcTs-hpsed appropriation. Where evidence showed that the reason claim was not paid was due to the fact that, prior to the time a statement was presented, the appropriation lapsed, an award will be made.

J.

PEZMAN,

Claimant, Foster-Westem Pharmacy, Inc., filed its original claim on November 16, 1962 seeking payment of the sum of $26,919.90 for pharmaceutical supplies furnished to Illinois Public Aid recipients for a period of several years.

Subsequently, on April 23, 1964, a stipulation of facts was entered into by the attorney for claimant and the Attorney General for the State'of Illinois whereby it was agreed as follows:

'*Foster-Western Pharmacy, Inc., an Illinois Corporation and claimant [*12] herein, is in the business of supplying pharmaceutical and sundry items to the public.

“Foster-Western Pharmacy, Inc., and the Public Aid Commission entered into an agreement wherein the State of Illinois was to reimburse the Foster-Western Pharmacy, Inc., for its sale to recipients of pharmaceuticals supplied by the said Foster-Western Pharmacy, Inc.

“The terms of the foregoing agreement and the acceptance thereof by the State of Illinois are fully set forth in the complaint hereto as exhibits A and B.

“The Foster-Westem Pharmacy, Inc., after fully performing its obligations under the said agreement rendered and mailed a bill to the State of Illinois for the sum of $13,459.95.

“The Seventy-Second biennium appropriations out of which the bill was payable had lapsed at the time the bill was mailed, and the funds to pay said bill were no longer available to the Public Aid Commission.

“Foster-Western Pharmacy, Inc., by its counsel, again represents that no assignment or transfer of the claim in this cause, or any part thereof or interest therein, has been made by Foster-Westem Pharmacy, Inc., and that the Foster-Western Pharmacy, Inc., is justly entitled to the sum of $13,459.95from the State of Illinois after allowing all just credits.”

An amended petition filed on May 12, 1964 reduced the ad damnum to $13,459.95,the amount of damages agreed upon in the stipulation.

This Court has held in previous decisions that, where the evidence shows that the only reason a claim was not paid was due to the fact that, prior to the time a statement was presented, the appropriation lapsed, an award will be made. Continental Oil Company vs. State of Illinois, 23 C.C.R. 70; M. J. Holleran, Inc., vs. State of Illinois, 23 C.C.R. 17.

Pursuant to the evidence submitted, and the stipulation of facts filed herein, an award is hereby made to claimant, Foster-Westem Pharmacy, Inc., in the sum of $13,459.95.

Official volume 25 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: August 25, 1964–November 17, 1966)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.