Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

Evans Construction Company v. State of Illinois

25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 14 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1964-09-25 No. 5132
Disposition: (No. 5132-Claimant awarded $3,740.00.) Award: $3,740.00 Agency: Department of Public Works and Buildings
Cite as: Evans Construction Company v. State of Illinois, 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 14 (1964)
Lapsed Appropriation 25 awarded 1960s Evans Construction Company v. State of Illinois 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 14 1964-09-25 (No. 5132-Claimant awarded $3,740.00.) /opinions/v25-p0047-1/

EVANS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, ACORPORATION, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for extra work on a state museum building contract; the court found the amount due and awarded $3,740.00 because the appropriation had lapsed before payment.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation. Where evidence showed that the only reason claim was not paid was due to the fact that, prior to the time a statement was presented, the appropriation lapsed, an award will be made.

The complaint filed herein alleges that there is now due and owing claimant from respondent the s u m of $3,740.00. Said amount represents charges for certain changes, alterations, additions and extra work in connection with a contract entered into with the State of Illinois, De[*15]partment of Public Works and Buildings, for the construction of a certain building in Springfield, Illinois, known as the New State Museum Building. The contract was entered into on December 28, 1960, and was subsequently amended by authorizations, issued by respondent, and agreed to by claimant.

It is further alleged that the provisions of the contract and subsequent authorizations were completely performed by claimant on or before November 18, 1963; that respondent was submitted a statement for the balance due and owing claimant on or about November 18, 1963; and, that the appropriation lapsed prior to the payment of said claim.

Respondent’s Departmental Report and Supplemental Departmental Report, dated January 8, 1964 and May 15, 1964, respectively, and signed by Francis S . Lorenz, Director of the Department of Public Works and Buildings, acknowledge that the balance due and owing claimant for performing said services is the sum of $3,740.00.

Respondent has stipulated in writing with claimant that the Departmental Report and Supplemental Departmental Report of the Department of Public Works and Buildings shall constitute the record in the case.

From the record submitted in this case, it appears that the amount of $3,740.00 is now due and owing claimant by respondent, and an award in that amount is hereby made.

Official volume 25 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: August 25, 1964–November 17, 1966)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.