Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Orestbayuk v. State of Illinois

25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 24 Illinois Court of Claims Filed November 10, 1964 No. 5177
Disposition: (No. 5177-Claimant awarded $1,260.00.) Award: $1,260.00 Agency: Secretary of State
Cite as: Orestbayuk v. State of Illinois, 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 24 (1964)
Legacy General 25 awarded 1960s Orestbayuk v. State of Illinois 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 24 November 10, 1964 (No. 5177-Claimant awarded $1,260.00.) /opinions/v25-p0057-1/

ORESTBAYUK, Claimant, os. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought refund of a $1,260 security deposit made under the Motor Vehicle Law after all claims from an accident were resolved. The court found claimant justly entitled to the refund and awarded the amount.

Claim type: Unjust Enrichment Refund

Statutes cited: Ch. 95½, Par. 7-503, Ill. Rev. Stats.

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. , I 25
  2. MOTOR VEmcLEs-escheat of safety responsibility deposit. Evidence disclosed that claimant was entitled to a refund of monies escheated to State pursuant to Chap. 95?4 See. 7-503, 111. Rev. Stats.

On August 27, 1964, claimant, Orest Bayuk, filed a complaint seeking refund of the Responsibility Security Fund deposited with the Secsetary of State of the State of Illinois, as required by Section 42-12 of the Motor Vehicle

I

Law of the State of IlIinois.

A stipulation was entered into by and between the attorney for claimant and the Attorney General for the State of Illinois. From such stipulation it appears: 1. That on or about August 23, 1959, claimant, Orest Bayuk, was involved in an automobile accident at Lake Zurich, Illinois. 2. That on or about November 25, 1959, claimant deposited with the Secretary of State of Illinois One Thousand Two Hundred Sixty Dollars ($1,260.00) as Financial Responsibility Security, as required by Section 42-12 of the Motor Vehicle Laws of the State of Illinois. 3. That all claims regarding said accident have been disposed of. 4. That more than three years have elapsed since the security deposit was deposited with the Secretary of State; that application for refund was not made within the stated time period; and, claimant’s security deposit was transferred to the General Revenue Fund in the State Treasury, pursuant to Chapter 95%, Par. 7-503, Ill. Rev. Stats. 5. That, on September 27, 1963, a demand was made upon the Secretary of State for a refund of said security deposit. 6. That claimant has not received a refund of the security deposit from the Secretary of State of Illinois; that [*26] no assignment or transfer of the claim has been made by claimant; and, that said claimant is justly entitled to the sum of One Thousand Two Hundred Sixty Dollars ($1,- 260.00) from the State of Illinois.

Sec. 7-503, Chap. 95%, Ill. Rev. Stats., provides that any person having a legal claim against such deposit may enforce it by appropriate proceedings in the Court of Claims. The Court is of the opinion that claimant has complied with the statute, and is justly entitled to a refund.

An award is accordingly made by this Court to claimant, Orest Bayuk, in the amount of $1,260.00.

Official volume 25 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: August 25, 1964–November 17, 1966)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.