Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Siegert-Mathewson Medical Group v. State of Illinois

25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 112 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1964-09-25 No. 5211
Disposition: (No. 5211-Claimant awarded $435.00. ) Award: $435.00 Agency: Department of Public Aid
Cite as: Siegert-Mathewson Medical Group v. State of Illinois, 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 112 (1964)
Legacy General 25 awarded 1960s Siegert-Mathewson Medical Group v. State of Illinois 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 112 1964-09-25 (No. 5211-Claimant awarded $435.00. ) /opinions/v25-p0145-1/

SIEGERT-MATHEWSON MEDICAL GROUP, A Partnership, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent. Opinion fled April 20, 1965.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for medical services rendered to Rachel Green under the Assistance to the Medically Indigent Aged program. The court awarded $435.00 because the contract was properly entered, services performed, charges proper, funds available at contract time, and the appropriation had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

Cases cited: Rockford Memorial Hospital Association, A Corporation, vs. State of Illinois, Case No. 5165, opinion filed September 25, 1964; Memorial Hospital of Du Page County, A Corporation, vs. State of Illinois, Case No. 5197, opinion filed January 12, 1965

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CoNTmcrs-kzpsed appropdktion. Where evidence showed that the only reason claim was not paid was due to the fact that, prior to the time a statement was presented, the appropriation lapsed, an award will be made.

On May 6, 1964, claimant, Siegert-Mathewson Medical Group, A Partnership, presented its statement to the Department of Public Aid for medical services rendered one Rachel Green. Claimant alleges that its statement for services was not submitted at an earlier date, because of failure of the Department of Public Aid to notify claimant that the said patient was subject to the provisions of its program for Assistance to the Medically Indigent Aged, and, further, that no part of its claim has been paid. Thereafter, on January 21, 1965, a complaint in this matter was filed in the [*113] Court of Claims. It contains a request for payment of the charges for medical services furnished said Rachel Green for the period of April 26, 1963 to, on or about May 26, 2963, inc.

A written stipulation was entered into between claimant and respondent, by their respective attorneys, which, in essence, supports the position of claimant in this matter. It indicates that claimant did furnish the services to one Rachel Green, and that, according to the fee schedule of payments established by the Department of Public Aid of the State of Illinois, the value of such services was in a total amount of $435.00. The stipulation reflects the further fact that the appropriation from which payment could have been paid had lapsed prior to the time the statement was submitted.

These facts are not refuted by the Department of Public Aid in the Departmental Report filed in this matter on February 19, 1965.

This Court has repeatedly held that, where a contract has been ( 1 ) properly entered into; ( 2 ) services satisfactorily performed, and materials furnished in accordance with such contract; ( 3 ) proper charges made therefor; (4) adequate funds were available at the time the contracts were entered into; and, ( 5 ) the appropriation for the biennium from which such claim could have been paid had lapsed, it would enter an award for the amount due. Rockford Memorial Hospital Association, A Corporation, vs. State of IZlinois, Case No. 5165, opinion filed September 25, 1964; Memorial Hospital of Du Page County, A Corporation, vs.

State of Illinois, Case No. 5197, opinion filed January 12, 1965. It appears that all qualifications for an award have been met in the instant case.

Claimant, Siegert-Mathewson Medical Group, a Partnership, is, therefore, hereby awarded the sum of $435.00.

Official volume 25 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: August 25, 1964–November 17, 1966)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.