Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Joseph Swee v. State of Illinois

25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 191 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1965-05-11 No. 51914
Disposition: (No. 51914laimants awarded $3,780.50.) Award: $3,780.50
Cite as: Joseph Swee v. State of Illinois, 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 191 (1965)
Legacy General 25 awarded 1960s Joseph Swee v. State of Illinois 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 191 1965-05-11 (No. 51914laimants awarded $3,780.50.) /opinions/v25-p0224-1/

JOSEPH SWEE,T. M. JABLONSKI, HAROLD MARISCEK, HENRY CARR, RAYMOND TOOHEY, MARY JANE WINN, HARRY HECHT,RAY- MOND DELANEY, ROY DROLEN, JOHN ALLMAN,RAYMOND CISCO, MILTON EDSTRAND, JOSEPH PETERS, LAWRENCE MAGGIO, WIL- LIAM O'BRIEN, WILLIAM TRIGG, NORA SCANNEL, and 0.W. WILSON AS SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, Claimants, os. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Police officers sought reimbursement for travel expenses incurred as Governor's messengers in extradition proceedings. The court awarded $3,780.50 based on a stipulation and Department of Finance report confirming the amounts were due but unpaid due to lapse of appropriation.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

Statutes cited: Chap. 60, Par. 41 of the 1963 Ill. Rev. Stats.

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. TRAVEExPENsEs-payment of extradition expenses. The expenses incurred in the extradition of a criminal, whose punishment of the crime shall be confinement in the penitentiary, shall be paid out of the State Treasury in pursuance of Chap. 60, Sec. 41, Ill. Rev. Stats.

On November 2, 1964, a petition for reimbursement for travel expenses, which were incurred by certain detectives and police officers of the City of Chicago in the performance of their official duties as messengers of the Governor of the State of Illinois in extradition proceedings, was filed in the Court of Claims. It is alleged therein that the sum of $5,186.15 is now due and owing claimants.

A written stipulation was subsequently entered into by and between 0. W. Wilson as Superintendent of Police of the City of Chicago and the Attorney General for the State of Illinois. It provides in part as follows: “That claimants are the duly appointed police officers of the Judicial District of Cook County of the State of Illinois with Police Headquarters located at 1121 South State Street, Chicago, Illinois. “That from the period of January 1, 1962 through June 30, 1963, as set forth in the Bill of Particulars of the Amended Complaint, said claimants incurred out of pocket expenses for travel and meals in the performance of their official duties as messengers of the Governor of the State of Illinois. “That, as set forth in the Bill of Particulars of the Amended Complaint, claimants were in the performance of official duties outside the State of Illinois pursuant to Chap. 60, Par. 41 of the 1963 111. Rev. Stats. “That the appropriation available during the 72nd biennium has lapsed. “That in each and every instance hereinabove set forth where the expenses were incurred there remained a sufficient unexpended balance in the appropriation from which payments could have been made. “That said claim has not been previously presented to any State Department or officer thereof, and that said claimants are the sole owners of the claim or interest therein, and that no assignment or transfer has been made of these claims, or any part thereof, except as stated in the complaint. “That claimants are justly entitled to the amounts therein claimed from the State of Illinois, or the appropriate State Authority, after aIlowing all just credits.

[*193] “That claimants believe the facts stated in their complaint are true, and that there is now due the sum of $3,780.50. “That no other claims arising out of the same occurrences have been previously presented to any person, corporation or tribunal other than the State of Illinois.”

In conjunction with the said stipulation, a joint motion of claimants and respondent was filed for leave to amend the ad damnum clause of claimants’ amended complaint. This motion was allowed in an order filed by the Chief Justice on March 19, 1965. It grants leave to claimants to amend the ad damnum clause by reducing their prayer for relief to $3,780.50.

A report of the Department of Finance, signed by James A. Ronan, Director, was also filed in this matter. The last paragraph thereof states: “Our records disclose that the messengers made the trips out of State in pursuance of proper authorizations, and their reimbursement accounts are due and payable in a total amount of $3,780.50. Vouchers were not drawn in payment of the expenses incurred for the reason that the same were presented after the biennial appropriation period had lapsed.”

With reference to extradition expenses, Sec. 41 of Chap. 60, 1963 Ill. Rev. Stats., provides as follows: “When the punishment of the crime shall be the confinement of the criminal in the penitentiary, the expenses shall be paid out of the State Treasury.” It appears that in the instant case all qualifications for an award have been met.

Claimants are, therefore, hereby awarded the total sum of $3,780.50 payable as follows: Joseph Swee and T. M. Jablonski.. ....................$902.30

Nora Scannel ....................................... 220.00

Harold Marsicek and Henry Carr.. ..................... 263.30 Raymond Toohey and Mary Jane Winn.. ................ 850.70 Harry Hecht and Raymond Delaney. ................... 638.65 Raymond Cisco and Milton Edstrand.. .................. 431.65 0. W. Wilson, Superintendent of Police of the City of Chicago. .................................

Official volume 25 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: August 25, 1964–November 17, 1966)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.