Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Black and Company v. State of Illinois

25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 358 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1966-08-17 No. 5188
Disposition: (No. 5188-Claimant awarded $503.86.) Award: $503.86 Agency: various departments of government
Cite as: Black and Company v. State of Illinois, 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 358 (1966)
Legacy General 25 awarded 1960s Black and Company v. State of Illinois 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 358 1966-08-17 (No. 5188-Claimant awarded $503.86.) /opinions/v25-p0391-1/

BLACK AND COMPANY, INC., ACORPORATION, Claimant, os. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $511.80 for hardware furnished to state departments; the court found $503.86 due and awarded that amount because the appropriation had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. ComFwxs-Zupsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

Claimant seeks to recover the sum of $511.80 for certain items of hardware furnished to various departments of government of the State of Illinois. On May 19, 1965, Mr. L. D. Ryan, a Vice-president of the claimant corporation, testified in behalf of claimant concerning the original invoice tickets bearing signatures of State employees totalling $503.86.

On June 17,1966, a stipulation was entered into by and between claimant and respondent establishing that the invoices were not paid because of the lapse of appropriations. That agreement establishes that the amount the respondent owes to claimant is $503.86.

This Court has routinely held that, where an appropriation for the biennium from which a claim should have been paid had lapsed, it will enter an order for the amount due to claimant.

Claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $503.86.

Official volume 25 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: August 25, 1964–November 17, 1966)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.