Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Stuart Weiss v. State of Illinois

25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 363 Illinois Court of Claims Filed August 17, 1966 No. 5300
Disposition: ( N o . 530O-Claimant awarded $20.00.) Award: $20.00 Agency: Board of Vocational Education and Rehabilitation
Cite as: Stuart Weiss v. State of Illinois, 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 363 (1966)
Legacy General 25 awarded 1960s Stuart Weiss v. State of Illinois 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 363 August 17, 1966 ( N o . 530O-Claimant awarded $20.00.) /opinions/v25-p0396-1/

( N o . 530O-Claimant awarded $20.00.) STUART WEISS,Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $40 for hospital care provided to Clarence Littig, but the agency denied the claim because services were rendered before July 1, 1965, and the appropriation had lapsed. The parties stipulated to an award of $20, and the court awarded that amount.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CoNmms-kzpsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.
  2. PRACTICE AND PROCEDvRE-stipUhtiOn in lieu Of record. Court Will consider case on Departmental Report where it is stipulated by the parties to constitute the record in the case.

Claimant, Stuart Weiss, M.D., presented his statement to the State of Illinois Board of Vocational Education and Rehabilitation for hospital care rendered to one Clarence Littig in April of 1965. The Board of Vocational Education and Rehabilitation had determined that the recipient was eligible to receive assistance. A Departmental Report was filed in this cause indicating that Dr. Stuart Weiss was entitled to the sum of $20.00, and also indicating that the Division of Vocational Rehabilitation of the Board had denied the claim for services rendered on the basis that it was services rendered prior to July 1, 1965, and that the appropria[*364]tion for that biennium had lapsed. On April 6, 1966, a complaint was filed herein by claimant seeking to recover the sum of $40.00 for services rendered to the said Clarence Littig.

Subsequently, on May 25, 1966, a stipulation was entered into by and between claimant and respondent whereby “neither party objects to the entiy of an order in favor of claimant and against respondent in the sum of $20.00.”

Pursuant to such stipulation and the Departmental Report, claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $20.00.

Official volume 25 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: August 25, 1964–November 17, 1966)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.