Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Virgil McCarty v. State of Illinois

25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 371 Illinois Court of Claims Filed November 17, 1966 No. 5314
Disposition: (No. 531PClaimant awarded $100.00.) Award: $100.00 Agency: Department of Public Aid
Cite as: Virgil McCarty v. State of Illinois, 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 371 (1966)
Legacy General 25 awarded 1960s Virgil McCarty v. State of Illinois 25 Ill. Ct. Cl. 371 November 17, 1966 (No. 531PClaimant awarded $100.00.) /opinions/v25-p0404-1/

VIRGILMCCARTY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $200 for medical services to a welfare recipient; the court awarded $100 because the appropriation had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CoNTucTs-hzpsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

Claimant seeks to recover the sum of $200.00 for services rendered by him to the Department of Public Aid.

A Departmental Report was filed admitting that one Simon Keppel was a recipient of assistance from the Department of Public Aid, and that services were rendered by claimant, Dr. Virgil McCarty, in connection with the amputation of the right leg of the recipient. The Departmental Report further disclosed that the statement for services was not paid on the grounds that funds appropriated for such payments had lapsed, and that there was now due Dr. McCarty the sum of $100.00.

Subsequently a stipulation was entered into by and between claimant and respondent, which stipulation conformed to the findings and recommendations of the Departmental Report.

This Court has held that, when the appropriation for the biennium from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, it will enter an order for the amount due claimant.

Claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $100.00.

Official volume 25 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: August 25, 1964–November 17, 1966)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.