Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

Garage v. State of Illinois

26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 227 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1968-10-10 No. 5537
Disposition: (No. 5537-Claimant awarded $65.31.) Award: $65.31 Agency: Department of Public Works and Buildings
Cite as: Garage v. State of Illinois, 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 227 (1968)
Lapsed Appropriation 26 awarded 1960s Garage v. State of Illinois 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 227 1968-10-10 (No. 5537-Claimant awarded $65.31.) /opinions/v26-p0268-1/

GARAGE, Claimant, vus. STATE OF ILLINOIS, PUN CH BROWN Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $71.94 for materials furnished to the Department of Public Works and Buildings. The court awarded $65.31 based on a stipulation and the doctrine of lapsed appropriation.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CoNTRAcTs-lapsed appropriation. Where contract has been properly entered into, all provisions thereof satisfactorily performed, proper charges made therefor, adequate funds were available at the time said contract was executed, and the appropriation from which such claim could and would have been paid had lapsed, a n award will be made.

Punch Brown Garage, claimant, seeks judgment in the sum of $71.94 for materials furnished to the Department of Public Works and Buildings, State Highway Building, Paris, Illinois.

A stipulation was entered into by claimant and respondent as follows :

“The report of the Department of Public Works and Buildings, dated August 19, 1968, (a copy of which is attached hereto, marked exhibit A, and, by this reference, incorporated herein and made apart hereof), shall be admitted into evidence in this proceeding without objection by either party.

“No other oral or written evidence will be introduced by either party.

“The Commissioner to which this case has been assigned and the Court may make and file their reports, recommendations, orders and decisions based upon the pleadings heretofore filed and the evidence herein stipulated.

“Neither party objects to the entry of an order in favor of claimant and against respondent in the sum of $65.31.

“Neither party desires to file briefs in this proceeding.

“Both parties waive notice of any hearing, and agree that the aforesaid order may be entered without either party being present.”

This is a matter of a lapsed appropriation, and this Court has repeatedly held that, where a contract has been (1)properly entered into ; ( 2 ) services are satisfactorily [*229] performed, and materials furnished in accordance with such contract; (3) proper charges made therefor; (4) adequate funds were available at the time the contract was entered into; and (5) the appropriation for the biennium from which such claim could have been paid had lapsed, it would enter an award for the amount due.

Claimant, Punch Brown Garage, is, therefore, awarded the sum of $65.31.

Official volume 26 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: January 10, 1967–June 20, 1969)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.