Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

McAlear Division of White Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. State of Illinois

26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 334 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1968-05-14 No. 5459
Disposition: (No. 5459-Claimant awarded $115.16.) Award: $115.16 Agency: Secretary of State, Superintendent of Buildings and Grounds
Cite as: McAlear Division of White Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. State of Illinois, 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 334 (1968)
Lapsed Appropriation 26 awarded 1960s McAlear Division of White Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. State of Illinois 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 334 1968-05-14 (No. 5459-Claimant awarded $115.16.) /opinions/v26-p0375-1/

MCALEARDIVISION OF WHITE CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS,Respond- ent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for materials furnished to the Secretary of State, Superintendent of Buildings and Grounds. The court awarded $115.16 because the appropriation for the biennium had lapsed, following precedent.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

Cases cited: Continental Oil Company vs. State of Illinois, 23 C.C.R. 70; M. J. Holleran, Inc. vs. State of Illinois, 23 C.C.R. 17

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation. Where evidence showed that the only reason claim was not paid was due to the fact that, prior to the time a statement was presented, the appropriation lapsed, an award will be made.

Claimant seeks payment of the sum of $115.16 for materials furnished the Secretary of State, Superintendent of Buildings and Grounds.

Exhibit A attached as a Departmental Report, and later admitted into evidence by virtue of a stipulation between claimant and respondent, states as follows : [*335]

“We acknowledge receipt of your letter, dated January 30, 1968, in which additional information is requested regarding the above transaction.

Our files fail to disclose wherein payment was made. However, the merchandise itemized on your enclosure was received, and we are, therefore, indebted for same.

Failure of the vendor to submit invoice vouchers covering these transactions within the appropriate biennium necessitates filing in the Court of Claims for payment.’’

Subsequently, on February 28,1968, a stipulation was entered into between claimant and respondent admitting said exhibit A into evidence, and agreeing that no further oral or written evidence would be introduced by either party; that no briefs would be filed, or other pleadings; and, that the cause could be assigned in the same manner as if all hearings and pleadings had been closed.

This Court has held numerous times that, where the evidence shows the only reason the claim was not paid was because the appropriation for the biennium in which the service was performed had lapsed, this Court would make an award. Continental Oil Company vs. State of Illinois, 23 C.C.R. 70, and M . J. Holleran, Inc. vs. State of Illinois, 23 C.C.R. 17.

Claimant, McAlear Division of White Consolidated Industries, Inc., is hereby awarded the sum of $115.16.

Official volume 26 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: January 10, 1967–June 20, 1969)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.