Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

Pheasant Run v. State of Illinois

26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 357 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1968-06-28 No. 5450
Disposition: (No. 5450-Claimant awarded $67.70.) Award: $67.70 Agency: Illinois Youth Commission
Cite as: Pheasant Run v. State of Illinois, 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 357 (1968)
Lapsed Appropriation 26 awarded 1960s Pheasant Run v. State of Illinois 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 357 1968-06-28 (No. 5450-Claimant awarded $67.70.) /opinions/v26-p0398-1/

PHEASANT RUN, INC., A Delaware Corporation, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $67.70 for services rendered to the Illinois Youth Commission. The court found the contract was properly entered into, services performed, and the appropriation had lapsed, so it awarded the full amount.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. WILLIAM G. CLARK, Attorney General; MORTON L. ZASLAVSKY, Assistant Attorney General, f o r Respondent.
  2. CONTRACTS-k%pSed appropriation. Where evidence showed that the only reason claim was not paid was due to the fact that, prior to the time a statement was presented, the appropriation lapsed, an award will be made.

Claimant, Pheasant Run, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, filed its complaint against respondent for the sum [*358] of $67.70 for services rendered the Illinois Youth Commission.

A stipulation was entered into by claimant and respondent as follows :

“That services were rendered to respondent at. the special instance and request of the Illinois Youth Commission.

“That the statements attached to the complaint as exhibit A are due and owing, namely Sixty-seven Dollars :and Seventy Cents ($67.70).

“That, as a result of delay in billing, payment was not made prior to the closing of the biennium appropriation.

“That no assignment or transfer of the claim has been made.

“That there is rightfully due to claimant the sum of Sixty-seven Dollars and Seventy Cents ($67.70).

“That upon the foregoing agreed case filed herein, the Court shall decide thereon, and render judgment herein according to the rights of the parties in the same manner as if the facts aforesaid were proved up upon the trial of said issue.”

This is a matter of a lapsed appropriation, and this Court has repeatedly held that, where a contract has been (1) properly entered into; (2) service is satisfactorily performed, and materials furnished in accordance with such contract; ( 3 ) proper charges made therefor; (4) adequate funds were available at the time the contracts were entered into; and, (5) the appropriation for the biennium from which such claim could have been paid had lapsed, it would enter an award for the amount due.

Claimant, Pheasant Run, Inc., is thereby awarded the sum of $67.70.

Official volume 26 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: January 10, 1967–June 20, 1969)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.