Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

LaSalle Extension University v. State of Illinois

26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 362 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1968-06-28 No. 5469
Disposition: (No. 5469-Claimant awarded $60.00.) Award: $60.00 Agency: Board of Vocational Education and Rehabilitation
Cite as: LaSalle Extension University v. State of Illinois, 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 362 (1968)
Lapsed Appropriation 26 awarded 1960s LaSalle Extension University v. State of Illinois 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 362 1968-06-28 (No. 5469-Claimant awarded $60.00.) /opinions/v26-p0403-1/

L.4 SALLEXTENSION UIVERSITY, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $60.00 for services and materials provided to the Board of Vocational Education and Rehabilitation for a correspondence course. The court found the contract was properly entered, services performed, and funds available, and awarded the full amount due.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

Cases cited: National Korectaire Company vs. State of Illinois, 22 C.C.R. 302; Gilbert-Hodgman, Inc. vs. State of Illinois, 24 C.C.R. 509

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CowrRAcm-lapsed appropriation. Where contract has been properly entered into, all provisions thereof satisfactorily performed,
  2. proper charges made therefor, adequate funds were available at the time said contract was executed, and the appropriation from which such claim could and would have been paid had lapsed, an award will be made. PERLIN,

Claimant, LaSalle Extension University, seeks payment in the sum of $60.00 for services and materials rendered to the Board of Vocational Education and Rehabilitation for a correspondence course for one Beatrice J. Tinsley. The parties have stipulated that, as a result of delay in billing by claimant herein, payment was not made prior to the closing of the biennium appropriation, and that the sum requested is lawfully due claimant.

Where a contract with the State has been (1)properly entered into ; (2) services satisfactorily performed, and materials furnished in accordance with such contract; (3) proper charges made therefor; and, (4)adequate funds were available at the time the contract was entered into, this Court will enter an award for the amount due. National Korectaire Company vs. State of lllinois, 22 C.C.R. 302 ; Gilbert-Hodgman, Inc. vs. State of Illinois, 24 C.C.R. 509. It appears that all the qualifications have been met in the instant case.

Claimant is hereby awarded the sum of $60.00.

Official volume 26 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: January 10, 1967–June 20, 1969)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.