Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

Xerox Corporation v. State of Illinois

26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 395 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1968-08-14 No. 5446
Disposition: (No. 5446-Claimant awarded $161.46.) Award: $161.46 Agency: Division of Highways, Bureau of Traffic, Department of Public Works and Buildings
Cite as: Xerox Corporation v. State of Illinois, 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 395 (1968)
Lapsed Appropriation 26 awarded 1960s Xerox Corporation v. State of Illinois 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 395 1968-08-14 (No. 5446-Claimant awarded $161.46.) /opinions/v26-p0436-1/

XEROX CORPORATION, Claimant, ‘v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Re- spondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $161.46 for materials and services provided to the Division of Highways. The court awarded the amount due because the contract was properly entered, services performed, and the appropriation had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-lapsed appropm’ation. Where contract has been properly entered into, all provisions thereof satisfactorily performed, proper charges made therefor, adequate funds were available at the time said contract was executed, and the appropriation from which such claim could and would have been paid had lapsed, an award will be made.

Claimant, Xerox Corporation, filed its complaint against respondent for the sum of $161.46 for materials and services rendered the Division of Highways, Bureau of Traffic, of the Department of Public Works and Buildings.

A stipulation was entered into by claimant and respondent as follows :

“That claimant, Xerox Corporation, had completed the work as alleged in claimant’s statement of claim.

“That there is lawfully due claimant the sum of One Hundred Sixty-One and 46/100 Dollars ($161.46).

“That, as a result of delay in billing by claimant herein, payment was not made prior to the closing of the biennium appropriation.

“That claimant Sontinues to be the sole person interested in this claim, and that no assignment thereof had occurred.

“That upon the foregoing agreed case filed herein the Court shall decide thereon and render judgment herein according to the rights of the parties in the same manner as if the facts aforesaid were proved upon the trial of said issue.”

This is a matter of a lapsed appropriation, and this [*396] Court has repeatedly held that, where a contract has been (1) properly entered into; (2) service is satisfactorily performed, and materials furnished in accordance with such contract; (3) proper charges made therefor; ( 4 ) adequate funds were available at the time the contracts were entered into; and, (5) the appropriation for the biennium from which such claim could have been paid had lapsed, it would enter an award for the amount due.

Claimant, Xerox Corporation, is thereby awarded the sum of $161.46.

Official volume 26 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: January 10, 1967–June 20, 1969)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.