Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Lapsed Appropriation
Download PDF

Municipal Tuberculosis Sanitarium v. State of Illinois

26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 403 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1968-09-25 No. 5465
Disposition: (No. 5465-Claimant awarded $196.60.) Award: $196.60 Agency: Department of Vocational Education and Rehabilitation
Cite as: Municipal Tuberculosis Sanitarium v. State of Illinois, 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 403 (1968)
Lapsed Appropriation 26 awarded 1960s Municipal Tuberculosis Sanitarium v. State of Illinois 26 Ill. Ct. Cl. 403 1968-09-25 (No. 5465-Claimant awarded $196.60.) /opinions/v26-p0444-1/

MUNICIPAL TUBERCULOSIS SANITARIUM, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for services rendered to students, and the court awarded $196.50 because the contract was proper, services were performed, and the appropriation had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

Cases cited: St. Mary's Hospital, Decatur, of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St. Francis, an Illinois Corporation, vs. State of Illinois, Case No. 5261, opinion filed February 24, 1966

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation. Where contract has been properly entered into, all provisions thereof satisfactorily performed, proper charges made therefor, adequate funds were available at the time said contract was executed, and the appropriation from which such claim could and would have been paid had lapsed, an award will be made.

Claimant, Municipal Tuberculosis Sanitarium, filed its complaint in the Court of Claims on February 2, 1968 in which it seeks the sum of $196.50 for services rendered.

A Departmental Report was filed, which stated in part:

“The total of $196.50 is due the vendor as all students received the services indicated on the voucher, and no payment was made to the vendor for the period shown.”

Subsequently a written stipulation was entered into by claimant and respondent, which reads as follows:

“The report of the Department of Vocational Education and Rehabilitation, dated March 13,1968, (a copy of which is attached hereto, marked exhibit A, and, by this reference, incorporated herein, and made a part hereof) shall be admitted into evidence in this proceeding without objection by either party.

“No other oral or written evidence will be introduced by either party.

“The Commissioner to which this case has been assigned and the Court may make and file their reports, recommendations, orders and decisions based upon the pleadings heretofore filed, and the evidence herein stipulated.

“Neither party objects to the entry of an order in favor of claimant and against respondent in the sum of $196.50.

“Neither party desires to file briefs in this proceeding.

“Both parties waive notice of any hearing, and agree that the aforesaid order may be entered without either party being present.”

This Court has repeatedly held that, where a contract has been (1) properly entered into; (2) services satisfactorily performed, and materials furnished in accordance with such contract; (3) proper charges made therefor; (4)adequate funds were available at the time the contracts were entered into; and, ( 5 ) the appropria[*405]tion for the biennium from which such claim could have Been paid had lapsed, it would enter an award for the amount due. St. Mary's Hospital, Decatur, of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St. Francis, aw Illinois Corporation, vs. State of Illinois, Case No. 5261, opinion filed February 24,1966. It appears that all qualifications for an award have been met in the instant case.

Claimant, Municipal Tuberculosis Sanitarium, is therefore, hereby .awarded the sum of $196.50.

Official volume 26 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: January 10, 1967–June 20, 1969)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.