Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Wendell Niepagen v. State of Illinois

27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 24 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1969-11-11 No. 5626
Disposition: (No. 5626-Claimant awarded $634.44.) Award: $634.44 Agency: Illinois Youth Commission
Cite as: Wendell Niepagen v. State of Illinois, 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 24 (1969)
Legacy General 27 awarded 1960s Wendell Niepagen v. State of Illinois 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 24 1969-11-11 (No. 5626-Claimant awarded $634.44.) /opinions/v27-p0038-2/

WENDELL NIEPAGEN,d/b/a WENDELL NIEPACENGREENHOUSE, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for plants sold to the Illinois Youth Commission. The court awarded the claimed amount because the claimant had performed all services and the only reason for non-payment was lack of appropriations.

Claim type: Contract

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. MOTOR VmrcLEs-escheut of Financial Responsibility deposit. Evidence disclosed that cl;iiiti;iiit \viis c w t i t l c ~ lt i l ii rc.fiintl o f iiionic.s cschwtctl to tlw Stilt(, pursuant to Ch. YS!;, Src. 7303, IIl.Rc~\..St;it.,1971.

Claimant, Wendell Niepagen, seeks recovery in the amount of $634.44, this being the amount of credit extend[*25]

I

ed by claimant to the Illinois Youth Commission for its j purchase of certain plants during the years of 1965, 1966, l and 1967.

The parties to this action have stipulated as follows: “The report of the office of the Illinois Youth Commission, dated April 17, 1969, shall be admitted into evidence in this proceeding without objection by either party. “No other oral or written evidence will be introduced by either party. “The Commissioner to which this case has been assigned and the Court may make and file their reports, recommendations, orders and decisions based upon the pleadings heretofore filed, and the evidence herein stipulated. “Neither party objects to the entry of an order in favor of claimant and against respondent in the sum of $634.44.”

The Illinois Youth Commission in its report admits to the fact that it purchased from Mr. Niepagen certain plants comprising a total amount of $634.44, and that Mr.

Niepagen had supplied all of the items purchased.

Since there appears to be no dispute concerning the fact that claimant has performed all the services entitling him to payment, and the only reason for non-payment of his claim is the fact that it is not possible for the Illinois Youth Commission to make payment from its present appropriations, this Court hereby awards claimant the sum of $634.44.

Official volume 27 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1969–June 30, 1972)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.