Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Phillips Business Systems v. State of Illinois

27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 363 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1972-03-24 No. 6406
Disposition: (No. 6406-Cl;iiin;mt i i w i r t l r t l $30590.) Award: $265.00 Agency: Pollution Control Board
Cite as: Phillips Business Systems v. State of Illinois, 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 363 (1972)
Legacy General 27 awarded 1970s Phillips Business Systems v. State of Illinois 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 363 1972-03-24 (No. 6406-Cl;iiin;mt i i w i r t l r t l $30590.) /opinions/v27-p0377-1/

PHILLIPS BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC., Clairnant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, Respondent. 0 j ) i n i o t i filrd March 24, 1972.

Case summary

The claimant sought payment for a contract from an appropriation that had lapsed. The court awarded the amount due.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CoNrHACl.s-/tr),,s~,f~ (r))))ro))ri(//io)t. \\'hyn the ~ i i ) ~ ) r ~ i ~ ) r i ~front i t i ( ~ iwhich i i~ claim should ha\.(, I i c ~ npaid has I i i ~ ) s ( d the . Court \vi11 cntrr :in :nvartl f o r the, amount dnv clainiant.

[*364] ( No . 6420-Claimant awarded $265.00.) OMS SURGICAL SUPPLY, INC., Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLINOIS,

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC AID, Respondent.

Opinion filed March 24, 1972.

OMS SURGICAL SUPPLY, INC., Claimant, pro se.

W ILLIAM J . SCOTT,Attorney General; S AUL R . WEXLER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

C O N T R A C T S - - ~ Uappropriation.

~J.W~ When the approlxiation frorn \vliich ;I claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Conrt will enter an anxrd for tlic. amount due claimant.

PERLIN, C.J.

Official volume 27 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1969–June 30, 1972)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.