MAX SHAPS,Claimant, os. STATE OF ILLINOIS, IIEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC AID, Respondent.
Case summary
Claimant sought payment from an appropriation that had lapsed. The court awarded the amount due because the appropriation had lapsed.
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- CONTRACTS - -appropriation. ~LT~~ When the appro~~riation f r o i l l d i c h i~ claim should have brrn paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an aw;trd tor thc amount due claimant.
( No . 616.3-Clainrant awartled $24.266.57.)
UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, Claimant, us. STATE OF
ILLINOIS, VARIOUS AGENCIES, Respondent.
Opinion filcd Ma!{ 9, 1972.
U NION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, Claimant, pro se.
WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; S AUL R. WEXLER,
Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.
CoNmAms-lapsed appropriatiott. When the appropriation froill \vhirli ii
claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for thc
amount due claimant.
PERLIN, C.J.