Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

( No 6m7-Claimant Awarded $399 v. Illinois Department of Public Aid

27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 442 Illinois Court of Claims Filed Jirne 13, 1972 No. 6647
Disposition: ( No 6M7-Claimant awarded $399,999.67.) Award: $399,999.67 Agency: Illinois Department of Public Aid
Cite as: ( No 6m7-Claimant Awarded $399 v. Illinois Department of Public Aid, 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 442 (1972)
Legacy General 27 awarded 1970s ( No 6m7-Claimant Awarded $399 v. Illinois Department of Public Aid 27 Ill. Ct. Cl. 442 Jirne 13, 1972 ( No 6M7-Claimant awarded $399,999.67.) /opinions/v27-p0457-1/

( No 6M7-Claimant awarded $399,999.67.) COUNTY OF COOK AND COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC AID, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC AID, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for an amount due from a lapsed appropriation. The court awarded $399,999.67 because the appropriation from which the claim should have been paid had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS - ~a),propriotion.
  2. U~F~~ When the appropriation frorri which ii claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will entor ;in a \ v d tor tlw amount due claimant.

[No. 6648-Claii11ant awartled $2,500.00.) SALVATORE SALLA, Claimant, us. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT

OF FINANCE, Respondent.

Opinion filed June 2.3, 1972.

P AUL W. RRUST, Attorney for Claimant.

WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; SAUL R . WEXLER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

C O N T R A C F S - ~uppropriation.

I~JS~~ \Vhen the appropriation f r o in \vliirli :I claim should have hem paid has lal)scd, the Court will enter an a\v:trtl for thr amount due clairnant.

PERLIN, C.J.

I

[*444] CASES IN REFERENCE TO THE LAW ENFORCE

MENT OFFICERS AND FIREMEN COMPENSATION

ACT

Official volume 27 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1969–June 30, 1972)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.