Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Legacy General
Download PDF

Number Two Chicago Dwellings Association v. State of Illinois

28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 105 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1972-10-23 No. 6384
Disposition: (No. 6384-Motion for Summary Judgment allowed.) Agency: Cook County Department of Public Aid
Cite as: Number Two Chicago Dwellings Association v. State of Illinois, 28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 105 (1972)
Legacy General 28 granted 1970s Number Two Chicago Dwellings Association v. State of Illinois 28 Ill. Ct. Cl. 105 1972-10-23 (No. 6384-Motion for Summary Judgment allowed.) /opinions/v28-p0122-1/

NUMBER Two CHICAGO DWELLINGS ASSOCIATION, An Illinois Not- For-Profit Corporation, Claimant, us., STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought $3,500 for uncollected rent due to alleged negligence in implementing a rent withholding order. The court granted respondent's motion for summary judgment because the claim was filed 137 days after the two-year statute of limitations had run, measured from the end of the withholding period.

Claim type: Contract

Cases cited: Landsman and Zaransky vs. State of Illinois, C.C.R. No. 6025

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. hrrAnoNs-negligence. Where action was filed 137 days after two year statute of limitations had run, respondent’smotion for summary judgment would be allowed.

Claimant seeks the sum of $3,500.00 for uncollected rent as a result of the Cook County Department of Public Aid’s alleged negligence in not implementing a rent withholding order issued by the Department on November 12, 1968, to July 1, 1969, for the recipients of Public Aid who resided at 515-17 West 65th Place, Chicago, Illinois.

The Complaint was filed on November 15, 1971.

Respondent made a Motion For Summary Judgment and as grounds for such Motion calls attention to the fact that this action was filed 137 days after the two year statute of limitations had run.

[*106] Respondent supported its Motion by citing the case of Landsman and Zaransky vs. State of Illinois, C.C.R. No. 6025, which was decided April 18, 1972.

In the above cited case, the Court of Claims dismissed the claim for unpaid rent for the reason that the action was filed 22 months after the rent withholding period. This case thus holds that the statute of limitations for rent withholding cases is measured from the last date of the withholding period.

Here the claimant has failed to file this claim within two years following the end of the rent withholding period.

Respondent further argued that claimant is guilty of contributory negligence for failure to take action when it was acquainted with the fact that the rent was not being withheld and called attention to the fact that a letter was written on August 2, 1972, which advised the claimant that the rent was not being withheld.

It is the finding of this Court that the claim not being filed within the period provided for by statute, the respondent’s Motion For Summary Judgment is in order.

Motion For Summary Judgment is hereby granted.

Official volume 28 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1972–June 30, 1973)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.