WALART MANAGEMENT Co., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL, Respondent.
Case summary
Claimant sought payment for services rendered, but the applicable appropriation had lapsed. The court awarded the amount due because a lapsed appropriation does not extinguish the obligation.
AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.
Headnotes
- Co”rRACTslapsed appropriation.When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter a n award for the amount due claimant.
(Ng. 73-CC-284-Claimant awarded $41,400.00.)
FRANK HUBBARD ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., Claimant, vs. STATE OF ILLINOIS, STATE FAIR AGENCY, Respondent.
Opinion filed July 26, 1973.
FRANK HUBBARD ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., Claimant, pro se.
WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; WILLIAM E. WEBBER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.
CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.
PER CURIAM.