Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Robert Traisman v. Illinois Department of Children an D Family Services

29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 48 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1973-08-15 No. 73-CC-329
Disposition: (No. 73-CC-329-Claimant awarded $140.00.) Award: $23.78 Agency: Illinois Department of Children and Family Services
Cite as: Robert Traisman v. Illinois Department of Children an D Family Services, 29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 48 (1973)
General Court of Claims 29 awarded 1970s Robert Traisman v. Illinois Department of Children an D Family Services 29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 48 1973-08-15 (No. 73-CC-329-Claimant awarded $140.00.) /opinions/v29-p0067-2/

ROBERT TRAISMAN, PH.D.,Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AN D FAMILY SERVICES, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for services rendered. The court awarded $140.00 because the appropriation from which the claim should have been paid had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-hpSed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed. the Court will enter a n award for the amount due claimaiLt

( No . 73-CC-334-Claimant awarded $23.78.)

<JOE DAMICO, Claimant, us. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT

O F TRANSPORTATION, Respondent.

Opinion filed August 15, 1973.

JOE DAMICO, Claimant, pro se.

WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; EDWARD L. S. ARKEMA, J R., Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

Co"rRAcTS-/apsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

P ER CURIAM.

Official volume 29 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1973–June 30, 1974)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.