Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Illinois Department of Transportation

29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 334 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1974-04-08 No. 74-CC-49
Disposition: (No. 74-CC-49AClaimant awarded $1,618.10.) Award: $1,618.10 Agency: Illinois Department of Transportation
Cite as: Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Illinois Department of Transportation, 29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 334 (1974)
General Court of Claims 29 awarded 1970s Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Illinois Department of Transportation 29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 334 1974-04-08 (No. 74-CC-49AClaimant awarded $1,618.10.) /opinions/v29-p0353-1/

SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE Co., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent.

Case summary

The claimant sought payment for a contract claim. The court awarded $1,618.10 because the appropriation from which the claim should have been paid had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-1UpSed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid h a s lapsed, the Court will enter a n award for the amount due claimant.

(No 74-CC-496-Clalmant awarded $148 04 1

KANKAKEE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY Co., Claimant, us. STATE OF

ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Respondent.

Opinion filed April 8,1974

K ANKAKEE INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY Co., Claimant, pro se.

WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; HOWARD W. FELDMAN , Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

CONTRACTS-hpSed appropriation When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant PER C URIAM.

Official volume 29 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1973–June 30, 1974)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.