INSTANT PRINTING CORPORATION, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, OFFICE OF THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for services rendered under a contract, but the appropriation from which the claim should have been paid had lapsed. The court awarded the amount due because the appropriation had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

CONTRACTS-hpSed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid h a s lapsed, the Court will enter a n award for the amount due claimant,

INSTANT PRINTING CORPORATION, Claimant, pro se. WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; SAUL R. WEXLER , Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

PER C URIAM.

The official report prints no opinion text for this claim beyond the heading, headnote, and judge line shown above. The Court's disposition is stated in the heading. See the PDF for the page as printed.