Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
General Court of Claims
Download PDF

Typewriter Service Co. v. Illinois Department of Mental Health

29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 444 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1974-06-05 No. 74-CC-638
Disposition: (No. 74-CC-638-Claimant awarded $25.00.) Award: $25.00 Agency: Illinois Department of Mental Health
Cite as: Typewriter Service Co. v. Illinois Department of Mental Health, 29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 444 (1974)
General Court of Claims 29 awarded 1970s Typewriter Service Co. v. Illinois Department of Mental Health 29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 444 1974-06-05 (No. 74-CC-638-Claimant awarded $25.00.) /opinions/v29-p0463-2/

TYPEWRITER SERVICE CO., Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought payment for services under a contract. The court awarded $25.00 because the appropriation from which the claim should have been paid had lapsed.

Claim type: Lapsed Appropriation

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. CONTRACTS-hpsed appropriation. When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter a n award for the amount due claimant,

( N ~ J74-CC-641-Claimant

. awarded $47.50.)

B ERZ AMBULANCE SERVICE, I NC., Claimant, us. STATE OF

ILLINOIS, DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL HEALTH, Respondent.

Opinion filed June 5, 1974.

BERZ AMBULANCE SERVICE, I NC ., Claimant, pro se [*445] WILLIAM J. SCOTT, Attorney General; SAUL R. WEXLER, Assistant Attorney General, for Respondent.

CONTRACTS-lapsed appropriation, When the appropriation from which a claim should have been paid has lapsed, the Court will enter an award for the amount due claimant.

PER CURIAM.

Official volume 29 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1973–June 30, 1974)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.