Illinois Court of Claims Opinions
Line of Duty Compensation
Download PDF

Gloria Freeman as Wife of Richard Freeman v. State of Illinois

29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 519 Illinois Court of Claims Filed 1973-07-30 No. 00041
Disposition: (No. 00041-Claimant awarded $10,000.00) Award: $10,000.00
Cite as: Gloria Freeman as Wife of Richard Freeman v. State of Illinois, 29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 519 (1973)
Line of Duty Compensation 29 awarded 1970s Gloria Freeman as Wife of Richard Freeman v. State of Illinois 29 Ill. Ct. Cl. 519 1973-07-30 (No. 00041-Claimant awarded $10,000.00) /opinions/v29-p0538-1/

GLORIA FREEMAN as wife of RICHARD FREEMAN, deceased, Claimant, v. STATE OF ILLINOIS, Respondent.

Case summary

Claimant sought benefits under the Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act for the death of her husband, a volunteer fireman who died from smoke inhalation while fighting a fire. The court found the death occurred in the line of duty and awarded $10,000.

Claim type: Line Of Duty Death

Statutes cited: Ch. 48, Sec. 281 et. seq., Ill. Rev. Stat., 1971; Section 282[e]

AI-generated summary from the opinion text — may contain errors. The opinion text and PDF above are the official record.

Headnotes

  1. L AW E NFORCEMENT OFFICERS ANDF IREMAN COMPENSATION ACT-Where investigation by Attorney General’s office shows that claim falls within scope of the Act death resulting from smoke inhalation while fighting a fire is compensable.

This claim was filed pursuant to Ch. 48, Sec. 281 et. seq., Ill. Rev. Stat., 1971, “Law Enforcement Officers and Firemen Compensation Act”. The Court is in receipt of the Application for Benefits and Statement of Supervising Officer, as well as an investigative report by the Illinois Attorney General’s office. Based upon these documents, the Court finds as follows: That the claimant, GLORIA F REEMAN, is the wife of the decedent and is the named beneficiary under the Application for Benefits. That the decedent, RICHARD F REEMAN was a volunteer fireman with the Village of [*520] Palatine Fire Department, engaged in the scope of his duty on February 23, 1973, within the meaning of Section 282 of the aforecited act. On said date, Fireman Freeman was summoned to a fire at the Ben Franklin Store in Palatine, owned by John Wilson, (Court of Claims No. 00040) also a volunteer fireman with the Palatine Fire Department. Wilson stated that there was a small fire in the basement and Firefighters Freeman, Wilson and Warren Ahlgrim (Court of Claims No. 00039) proceeded to the basement equipped with a hose line and wearing facial air packs. The fire mushroomed, the smoke became intense and efforts to reach the three firefighters in the basement were unsuccessful. After the smoke subsided Firefighter Freeman was found unconscious in the basement. 20 to 25 minutes had elapsed during the firefighting activity and active breathing had depleted the air supply in the air packs. Firefighter Freeman died on February 23,1973, and the toxicologists report indicates that an analysis of the blood showed that the "hemoglobin was saturated with 79% carbon monoxide". The coroner's physician related that "there are full thickness burns involving the face and forehead. There is some soot-staining of the face. There are no marks of external violence or trauma." The cause of death is recited as "smoke inhalation". The Court further finds that the Attorney General's office in its investigation had determined that this claim is within the scope of the above cited statutes:

"Section 282[e] 'killed in the line of duty' means losing one's life as a result of injury received in the active performance of duties as a law enforcement officer or fireman if the death occurs within one year from the date the injury was received and if that injury arose from violence or other accidental cause. . . ."

It Is Hereby Ordered that the sum of $10,000.00 (Ten Thousand Dollars) be, and the same hereby is, [*521] granted to GLORIA F REEMAN as wife and nest of kin of the decedent R ICHARD F REEMAN .

Official volume 29 (Containing cases in which opinions were filed and orders of dismissal entered, without opinion between: July 1, 1973–June 30, 1974)  ·  All opinions in this volume  ·  Also on CourtListener

This text is OCR/derived from the official volume and may contain errors. The PDF is authoritative. Boundary pages shared with the adjacent opinion are reproduced whole, so the page image may show a neighbor's opening or closing lines; the transcript text itself is opinion-scoped. See About & sources.